Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1697517
| From | "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module |
| Date | 2017-07-26 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7AtI-4y2-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u7qb0-6t0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7qkG-6w4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7rJM-7vZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 07:24 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Wed, 26 Jul 2017 10:48:27 +0200 > Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> escreveu: > > > From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> > > > > Register with the GHES notifier chain so that there's no need to > > call into the module with ghes_edac_report_mem_error(). > > Hmm... I'm not seeing any implementation that would allow setting > between firmware first, hardware first or "auto", as we've discussed. A minor nit for terminology - hardware is always the first one to detect an error. The difference is whether an error is first reported to the kernel or firmware. So, "kernel first" or "os first" would be more appropriate as an alternative to "firmware first". That said, such wording may be misleading since it does not change the mode. Thanks, -Toshi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/3] EDAC: Convert ghes_edac to a normal module Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-07-26 10:50 +0200
[PATCH 2/3] ACPI/GHES: Add an EDAC notifier chain Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-07-26 10:50 +0200
[PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-07-26 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-07-26 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 13:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> - 2017-07-26 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> - 2017-07-26 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-07-27 07:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> - 2017-07-26 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@hpe.com> - 2017-07-28 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC, ghes: Make it a proper module Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-07-29 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/3] EDAC: Convert ghes_edac to a normal module Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-07-27 08:00 +0200
csiph-web