Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1697541
| From | Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access |
| Date | 2017-07-26 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7AWJ-4Xd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <u7xPc-2P1-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7xYU-37A-55@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7y8z-3b6-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7yig-3eE-63@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7A0F-4lW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 12:16:11PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > Silently turn on DAX if HMAT says its ok? Yes, absolutely. I want my system to do the right thing by default, and if HMAT says bypassing the page cache is a clear advatange it should be the default. > I think we would instead > want a "-o autodax" for that case and then "-o dax" and "-o nodax" for > the force cases. Why? > I think it's easier to administer than the dax mount option. If > someone wants dax on only in a sub-tree they can set the flag on that > parent directory and have a policy in dax filesystems that children > inherit the dax policy from the parent. That seems a better > administrative model than trying to get it all right globally at mount > time. And why exactly? If DAX is faster for file a in directory X it will be just as fast for a file b in directory Y.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access sunqiuyang <sunqiuyang@huawei.com> - 2017-07-20 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-07-22 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Sun Qiuyang <sunqiuyang@huawei.com> - 2017-07-24 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-07-26 04:20 +0200
RE: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access sunqiuyang <sunqiuyang@huawei.com> - 2017-07-26 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-07-26 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-07-26 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-07-26 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 22:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/1] f2fs: dax: implement direct access Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-07-26 22:30 +0200
csiph-web