Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1697524
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.4 40/57] tpm: Provide strong locking for device removal |
| Date | 2017-07-26 22:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7ADn-4Bn-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u4Vbk-7Nz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4Vbn-7Nz-75@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7gY1-xa-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:56:01PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-07-19 at 13:12 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
> >
> > commit 4e26195f240d73150e8308ae42874702e3df8d2c upstream.
> >
> > Add a read/write semaphore around the ops function pointers so
> > ops can be set to null when the driver un-registers.
> [...]
> > @@ -49,10 +99,10 @@ struct tpm_chip *tpm_chip_find_get(int c
> > if (chip_num != TPM_ANY_NUM && chip_num != pos->dev_num)
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (try_module_get(pos->dev.parent->driver->owner)) {
> > + /* rcu prevents chip from being free'd */
> > + if (!tpm_try_get_ops(pos))
> [...]
>
> But an RCU read-side critical section is an atomic context, and
> semaphore operations can block! Fixed upstream by:
>
> commit 15516788e581eb32ec1c50e5f00aba3faf95d817
> Author: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Mon Feb 29 08:53:02 2016 -0500
>
> tpm: Replace device number bitmap with IDR
Ugh, that's a big patch.
Jason, Stefan, and Jarkko, what do you think? Should I also take this
for 4.4-stable?
thanks,
greg k-h
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 4.4 40/57] tpm: Provide strong locking for device removal Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-19 13:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.4 40/57] tpm: Provide strong locking for device removal Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk> - 2017-07-26 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.4 40/57] tpm: Provide strong locking for device removal Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-26 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.4 40/57] tpm: Provide strong locking for device removal Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> - 2017-07-26 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.4 40/57] tpm: Provide strong locking for device removal Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-07-29 00:50 +0200
csiph-web