Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1695033
| From | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem |
| Date | 2017-07-24 21:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u6Rdh-OM-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u6QKd-nq-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u6R3A-KM-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u6R3z-KM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:15:48PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Am 24.07.2017 um 20:57 schrieb Pavel Machek: > > >Would it be feasible to run bcache (write-through) with existing ext4 > > >filesystem? > > > > > >I have 400GB of data I'd rather not move, and SSD I could use for > > >caching. Ok, SSD is connecte over USB2, but I guess it is still way > > >faster then seeking harddrive on random access > > > > i doubt that seriously - USB2 has a terrible latency > > Well.. if that's too slow, I can get SSD M.2; plus bcache docs says > that combination works. > > And... if you ever tried to do git diff while git checkout is running > on spinning rust... spinning rust has awful parameters when idle, and > it only gets worse when loaded :-(. So some hard numbers. Max throughput of USB 2.0 is 53 MiB/s[1]. In actual practice the max throughput you will see out of the USB 2.0 interface is 30-40 MiB/s. In contrast, a HDD doing sequential reads can easily do much more than that. [1] https://superuser.com/questions/317217/whats-the-maximum-typical-speed-possible-with-a-usb2-0-drive So a lot is going to depend on how bcache works. If you can get large sequential reads and writes to *bypass* the cache device, then I think there's a good cache that bcache on a USB 2.0 device won't hurt. It might not help as much as you like, but that's a function of the overhead of populating the cache and whether the cache can keep the useful bits in the cache device. Cheers, - Ted
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-24 21:00 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-24 21:20 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2017-07-24 21:30 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-24 22:10 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2017-07-25 07:00 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-25 08:50 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-25 13:10 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-25 13:20 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2017-07-25 18:20 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> - 2017-07-25 20:20 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-26 00:10 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> - 2017-07-26 19:50 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com> - 2017-07-26 21:10 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Eric Wheeler <bcache@lists.ewheeler.net> - 2017-07-26 21:20 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-26 22:10 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-25 15:50 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2017-07-25 20:10 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-25 23:00 +0200
Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> - 2017-07-24 21:30 +0200
csiph-web