Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1694147

Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver

From Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver
Date 2017-07-22 14:00 +0200
Message-ID <u61eF-1sw-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <u4Y9c-1j1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <u54HE-5TE-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <u5fa2-4Lf-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <u5ihA-6PH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u5MSm-ZJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw



On 07/21/2017 10:37 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/20, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hi Gabriel,
>>
>> On 07/20/2017 11:31 AM, Gabriel FERNANDEZ wrote:
>>> Hi Vladimir,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/19/2017 11:20 PM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>> Hello Gabriel,
>>>>
>>>> On 07/19/2017 05:25 PM, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>>>>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +	rcc: rcc@58024400 {
>>>> 'rcc' as a generic device node name is awkward.
>>>>
>>>> I believe the main function of the device is clock controller (unlikely
>>>> a generic reset controller can be converted into a clock controller),
>>>> the locations of the document and device driver also indicate that
>>>> primarily it is a clock controller, so I suggest to replace device node
>>>> name with 'clock-controller' like below:
>>> I prefer to keep rcc node name, to be coherent with the other ST
>>> platforms (STM32F4/F7)
>> the thing is, a device node name is expected to comply with ePAPR or
>> the devicetree specification, which says
>>
>> 	The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting
>> 	the function of the device and not its precise programming model.
>>
>> If devicetree and CCF maintainers are fine with 'rcc', I won't object,
>> my role is just to emphasize the found issue and recommend to use another
>> and more common name 'clock-controller', it is a simple and fortunately
>> backward compatible change to other ST platforms as well.
> Yes. It should be generic so clock-controller or
> clock-reset-controller is appropriate here.
>
ok i will change order... reset-clock-controller name to match with rcc.

Best Regards
Gabriel

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v7 0/3] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver <gabriel.fernandez@st.com> - 2017-07-19 16:30 +0200
  [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: gate: expose clk_gate_ops::is_enabled <gabriel.fernandez@st.com> - 2017-07-19 16:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: gate: expose clk_gate_ops::is_enabled Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> - 2017-07-19 23:10 +0200
  [PATCH v7 1/3] clk: nxp: clk-lpc32xx: rename clk_gate_is_enabled() <gabriel.fernandez@st.com> - 2017-07-19 16:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] clk: nxp: clk-lpc32xx: rename  clk_gate_is_enabled() Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> - 2017-07-19 23:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> - 2017-07-19 23:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@st.com> - 2017-07-20 10:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com> - 2017-07-20 14:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-21 22:40 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@st.com> - 2017-07-22 14:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] clk: stm32h7: Add stm32h743 clock driver Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@st.com> - 2017-07-22 14:00 +0200

csiph-web