Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1692976
| From | Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/dcache: Limit numbers of negative dentries |
| Date | 2017-07-20 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u5kCJ-ew-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u4epJ-5H0-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4ezo-5Kj-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <u53Lz-5fP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u544W-5nE-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <u5e4h-41p-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Red Hat |
On 07/20/2017 03:20 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:42 PM, Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> @@ -603,7 +698,13 @@ static struct dentry *dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
>>>>
>>>> if (!IS_ROOT(dentry)) {
>>>> parent = dentry->d_parent;
>>>> - if (unlikely(!spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock))) {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Force the killing of this negative dentry when
>>>> + * DCACHE_KILL_NEGATIVE flag is set.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (unlikely(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_KILL_NEGATIVE)) {
>>>> + spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
>>> This looks like d_lock ordering problem (should be parent first, child
>>> second). Why is this needed, anyway?
>>>
>> Yes, that is a bug. I should have used lock_parent() instead.
> lock_parent() can release dentry->d_lock, which means it's perfectly
> useless for this.
As the reference count is kept at 1 in dentry_kill(), the dentry won't
go away even if the dentry lock is temporarily released.
> I still feel forcing free is wrong here. Why not just block until
> the number of negatives goes below the limit (start reclaim if not
> already doing so, etc...)?
Force freeing is the simplest. Any other ways will require adding more
code and increasing code complexity.
One reason why I prefer this is to avoid adding unpredictable latency to
the regular directory lookup and other dentry related operations. We can
always change the code later on if there is a better way of doing it.
Cheers,
Longman
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/dcache: Limit numbers of negative dentries Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> - 2017-07-19 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/dcache: Limit numbers of negative dentries Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-07-19 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/dcache: Limit numbers of negative dentries Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> - 2017-07-20 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/dcache: Limit numbers of negative dentries Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-07-20 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/dcache: Limit numbers of negative dentries Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> - 2017-07-20 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/4] fs/dcache: Limit numbers of negative dentries Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> - 2017-07-20 17:50 +0200
csiph-web