Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1692563

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: add VMAP_STACK and detect out-of-bounds SP

Show all headers | View raw

Hi Ard,

On 20/07/17 06:35, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 20 July 2017 at 00:32, Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> wrote:
>> I didn't notice any performance impact but I also wasn't trying that
>> hard. I did try this with a different configuration and ran into
>> stackspace errors almost immediately:
>>
>> [ 0.358026] smp: Brought up 1 node, 8 CPUs
>> [ 0.359359] SMP: Total of 8 processors activated.
>> [ 0.359542] CPU features: detected feature: 32-bit EL0 Support
>> [    0.361781] Insufficient stack space to handle exception!

[...]

>> [    0.367382] Task stack: [0xffffff8008e80000..0xffffff8008e84000]
>> [    0.367519] IRQ stack:  [0xffffffc03bf62000..0xffffffc03bf66000]
> 
> The IRQ stack is not 16K aligned ...

>> [    0.367687] ESR: 0x00000000 -- Unknown/Uncategorized
>> [    0.367868] FAR: 0x0000000000000000
>> [    0.368059] Kernel panic - not syncing: kernel stack overflow
>> [    0.368252] CPU: 4 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/4 Not tainted 4.12.0-00018-ge9cf49d604ef-dirty #23
>> [    0.368427] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
>> [    0.368612] Call trace:
>> [    0.368774] [<ffffff8008087fd8>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x228
>> [    0.368979] [<ffffff80080882c8>] show_stack+0x10/0x20
>> [    0.369270] [<ffffff80084602dc>] dump_stack+0x88/0xac
>> [    0.369459] [<ffffff800816328c>] panic+0x120/0x278
>> [    0.369582] [<ffffff8008088b40>] handle_bad_stack+0xd0/0xd8
>> [    0.369799] [<ffffff80080bfb94>] __do_softirq+0x74/0x210
>> [    0.370560] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
>> [    0.384269] Rebooting in 5 seconds..
>>
>> The config is based on what I use for booting my Hikey android
>> board. I haven't been able to narrow down exactly which
>> set of configs set this off.
>>
> 
> ... so for some reason, the percpu atom size change fails to take effect here.

I'm not completely up to speed with these series, so this may be noise:

When we added the IRQ stack Jungseok Lee discovered that alignment greater than
PAGE_SIZE only applies to CPU0. Secondary CPUs read the per-cpu init data into a
page-aligned area, but any greater alignment requirement is lost.

Because of this the irqstack was only 16byte aligned, and struct thread_info had
to be be discovered without depending on stack alignment.


Thanks,

James

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: add VMAP_STACK and  detect out-of-bounds SP Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2017-07-19 00:00 +0200
  Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: add VMAP_STACK and  detect out-of-bounds SP Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-07-19 10:10 +0200
    Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: add VMAP_STACK and  detect out-of-bounds SP Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-07-20 07:40 +0200
      Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: add VMAP_STACK  and detect out-of-bounds SP James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> - 2017-07-20 10:40 +0200
        Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: add VMAP_STACK and  detect out-of-bounds SP Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-07-20 11:00 +0200
          Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: add VMAP_STACK and  detect out-of-bounds SP Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - 2017-07-20 19:40 +0200
            Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: add VMAP_STACK and  detect out-of-bounds SP Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> - 2017-07-20 21:20 +0200

csiph-web