RE: [PATCH] drm/udl: Make page_flip asynchronous

From	Michal Lukaszek <michal.lukaszek@displaylink.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	RE: [PATCH] drm/udl: Make page_flip asynchronous
Date	2017-07-20 11:10 +0200
Message-ID	<u5fD4-5dz-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<u1Xjk-7kC-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u1Xjk-7kC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u2Pa2-7UJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <u2PWp-8rc-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thursday, July 13, 2017 7:11 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:

>>> Can't we roll this driver over to the atomic helpers instead? There
>>> you get nonblocking pretty much for free ... I'm not sure extending
>>> the old modeset code has all that much benefit really.

>> This code certainly has value by itself; it makes the driver more
>> efficient. I think the best can sometimes be the enemy of the good --
>> this code is here and written, but I don't think any of us is going to
>> tackle atomic for udl.

> Sure, I guess I should have clarified this with "If you want me to
> review and merge this, then pls look into atomic, since that seems
> actually beneficial for my own interest". I'm not paid by intel to
> review driver patches at random, but to keep overall drm in nice
> shape. Moving drivers to atomic and using more shared infrastructure
> is in that interest, reviewing random driver patches isn't.

So, what's the next step here then? This code makes udl work better, without investing a lot of effort to move everything to atomics.

Btw, this is already causing modesetting not to support page flips (while Chrome OS, having this code uses page flips with udl):
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/tree/hw/xfree86/drivers/modesetting/driver.c#n1198 

Regards,
Michal Lukaszek

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

RE: [PATCH] drm/udl: Make page_flip asynchronous Michal Lukaszek <michal.lukaszek@displaylink.com> - 2017-07-20 11:10 +0200

csiph-web