Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1692253
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -next v3 0/9] rbtree: Cache leftmost node internally |
| Date | 2017-07-20 01:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u56gp-73P-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tXLgJ-1X8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u566K-6L0-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Andrew Morton wrote: >On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 10:15:44 -0700 Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> wrote: > >> Changes from v2 (https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/6/8/857): >> - Fixed 0day reported crash for drm_mm selftest program. We were >> not correctly using the cached version of rbtree with the allocated >> nodes. >> - Added cfq patch to use internal rbtree caching. >> - Added Christian's and Jan's reviews. >> >> Changes from v1 (https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=149611025616685): >> - No longer rfc. >> - Removed bogus semimcolon in rb_first_cached() >> - Updated missing interval tree user drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ >> - Removed redundant @cached arg in when erasing a node. >> - Added more patches that make use of rb_first_cached(), which I >> thought might be worth it: procfs and epoll. >> - Cc more people for patch 5, which touches drivers such as infiniband >> and gpu. The rest of the changes are pretty covered with the current >> Cc'ed maintainers and mm folks. >> >> Hi, >> >> Here's a proposal for extending rbtrees to internally cache the leftmost >> node such that we can have fast overlap check optimization for all interval >> tree users[1]. The benefits of this series are that: >> >> (i) Unify users that do internal leftmost node caching. > >That's nice. Except the series adds more lines than it removes. > >> (ii) Optimize all interval tree users. > >Was any attempt made to quantify the benefit? Yes, but ultimately it will depend a lot on the workload and size of the tree. For bare numbers, on a Xeon E5-2450 @ 2.10GHz the cost of a rb_first() was ~60 cycles for 100 nodes, and ~75 cycles with 1000 nodes. fwiw. Thanks, Davidlohr
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH -next v3 0/9] rbtree: Cache leftmost node internally Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-07-20 01:00 +0200 Re: [PATCH -next v3 0/9] rbtree: Cache leftmost node internally Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2017-07-20 01:10 +0200
csiph-web