Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1692278
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection |
| Date | 2017-07-20 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u56Jr-7ff-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u4KIW-PC-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4KIW-PC-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <u52Zc-4Fq-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <u56q6-77M-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:12:37PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote: > > +#define ASM_UNREACHABLE \ > > + "999: .pushsection .discard.unreachable\n\t" \ > > + ".long 999b - .\n\t" \ > > + ".popsection\n\t" > > Will this end up running into the same bug fixed with > 3d1e236022cc1426b0834565995ddee2ca231cee and the __LINE__ macro? I > could tell under which conditions gcc would do this kind of merging... I hope not, but objtool should complain about it if it does. We could involve the __LINE__ macro, or some other way to make the labels unique, but that might complicate the code a bit, so we can delay doing that unless necessary. -- Josh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-19 02:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 1/2] x86/asm: Add suffix macro for GEN_*_RMWcc() Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-19 02:10 +0200
[PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-19 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-07-19 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-19 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-07-19 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-20 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-07-20 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-20 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] x86/refcount: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-07-20 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-07-20 11:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-20 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-21 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-07-21 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-07-21 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-22 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-07-24 08:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-24 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-07-24 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] x86: Implement fast refcount overflow protection Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-24 14:30 +0200
csiph-web