Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1691718

Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts

From Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts
Date 2017-07-19 16:30 +0200
Message-ID <u4Y9d-1j1-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <u4Wh4-8vz-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4Wh4-8vz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4WAq-bK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4XGa-SU-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization ARM Ltd

Show all headers | View raw


On 19/07/17 14:58, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 
>> 2017-07-19 14:25 GMT+02:00 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>:
>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>
>>>> Some frameworks (e.g. iio, gpiolib) use irq_work to implement simulated
>>>> interrupts that can be 'fired' from process context when needed and
>>>> requested just like normal interrupts. This is useful for testing and
>>>> development purposes.
>>>>
>>>> Currently this code is reimplemented by every user. This series
>>>> proposes to add a new set of functions that can be used by drivers
>>>> that want to simulate interrupts without having to duplicate any
>>>> boilerplate code.
>>>>
>>>> The first patch adds a simple irq simulator framework. The second
>>>> extends it with resource management. The third uses the new
>>>> functionality in the gpio-mockup testing driver.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: The next candidate for using this API would be iio-dummy-evgen.
>>>
>>> I like the general idea - have not looked at the code yet. Just a quick
>>> question: How many copies/variants of this scheme do we have in tree?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>         tglx
>>
>> Currently there are two: iio and gpiolib basically duplicate the same
>> code in their respective testing drivers. I only used irq_sim in
>> gpio-mockup in this series as an example and to see if there's any
>> interest in merging it before spending time on iio-dummy-evgen.
> 
> Yes, I think so. Consolidation is always a good thing and simulation is
> useful for developing or validating code.

Indeed, that's pretty interesting.

On a slightly tangential subject, there is another aspect that I thought
of implementing for a while, but always ended up just relying on a quick
hack: forcing the injection of an actual interrupt. A number of
interrupt controllers have the ability to make an interrupt pending, for
it to be handled as if a device had actually triggered it.

In my case, it has proved to be incredibly useful when debugging the
interrupt controller itself, and also things that mess with interrupts
in a creative way (like KVM) while relying on a particular interrupt
controller.

What I had in mind was something like:

echo 1 >/proc/irq/9/trigger (or the corresponding
/sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/ interface if we want to make sure that this
is really not for production use...).

If there is any interest, I'll try to whip something up.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-07-19 14:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> - 2017-07-19 14:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-07-19 16:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-19 16:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 16:50 +0200
          Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-07-19 17:00 +0200
            Re: [PATCH 0/3] simulated interrupts Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-07-19 18:00 +0200

csiph-web