Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1690478

Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change

From "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change
Date 2017-07-18 19:10 +0200
Message-ID <u4Eaw-5aT-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <u2LJ7-5H5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4198-5Br-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <u47oe-1fK-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4dtE-51t-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <u4tyq-6Oe-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:41:38PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [170717 05:40]:
> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 11:08:07PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> [170716 16:25]:
> > > > I reused the rcu_irq_enter_irqson() from RCU_NONIDLE to avoid this issue. 
> > > > It works fine.
> > > > 
> > > > Tony, Could you like to give a tested-by if this patch works for you.
> > > 
> > > Yeah that keeps things booting for me with no splats so:
> > > 
> > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > > 
> > > In general, it seems we're missing the knowledge in Linux kernel
> > > of when the entire system is idle. Right now it seems that only
> > > cpuidle_coupled knows that?
> > > 
> > > We could probably simplify things by adding some PM state for
> > > entire system idle. Then cpuidle code and timer code could use
> > > that to test when it's safe to do whatever the SoC needs to do
> > > to enter deeper power states.
> > > 
> > > If we already have something like that, please do let me know :)
> > 
> > Well, we used to have CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE, which detected
> > full-system idle lazily so as to avoid scalability bottlenecks.
> > https://lwn.net/Articles/558284/
> > 
> > No one was using it, so I removed it last merge window.  The
> > patch that removed it is at sysidle.2017.05.11a, which can
> > probably still be reverted cleanly.  Or just use v4.11 or earlier.
> 
> OK thanks for the pointer, for reference that commit is
> fe5ac724d81a ("rcu: Remove nohz_full full-system-idle state
> machine").
> 
> For a potential user, I think we could use it for example in
> cpuidle_enter_state_coupled() + omap_enter_idle_coupled() where
> we try to figure out if the system is fully idle before calling
> tick_broadcast_enter().

Would you be willing to prototype your usage on v4.12?  It still has
NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE.  You have to enable NO_HZ_FULL in order to enable
NO_HZ_FULL_SYSIDLE at the moment.

Either way, here is the important bit for usage:

	bool rcu_sys_is_idle(void);
	void rcu_sysidle_force_exit(void);

The rcu_sys_is_idle() function returns true if all CPUs other than the
time-keeping CPU (that is, tick_do_timer_cpu, which is usually CPU 0)
are in their idle loop.  Of course, if you invoke rcu_sys_is_idle()
from any CPU other than the time-keeping CPU, you will automatically
get a return value of false.

RCU's idle-exit code already sets state appropriately, but if there
is some other circumstance where you need to force the state machine
out of all-CPUs-idle state, you can call rcu_sysidle_force_exit().

							Thanx, Paul

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-07-13 09:10 +0200
  Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-07-13 11:50 +0200
    Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-07-13 14:00 +0200
      Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-13 14:50 +0200
        Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-07-17 01:30 +0200
          Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-07-17 08:10 +0200
            Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-17 14:40 +0200
              Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-07-18 07:50 +0200
                Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-18 19:10 +0200
                Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-07-19 10:10 +0200
          Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org> - 2017-07-27 12:00 +0200
            Re: Regression with suspicious RCU usage splats with cpu_pm change "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-07-27 23:50 +0200

csiph-web