Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1688624
| Path | csiph.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH v9 4/7] perf report: Refactor the branch info printing code |
| Date | Mon, 17 Jul 2017 05:20:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u44JH-7XV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u44A2-7UE-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Extloop1 | 1 |
| X-Ironport-Av | E=Sophos;i="5.40,372,1496127600"; d="scan'208";a="879550526" |
| X-Mailer | git-send-email 2.7.4 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 179 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com, Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> |
| X-Original-Date | Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:06:40 +0800 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <1500289603-4352-5-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> |
| X-Original-References | <1500289603-4352-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1688624 |
Show key headers only | View raw
The branch info such as predicted/cycles/... are printed at the
callchain entries.
For example: perf report --branch-history --no-children --stdio
--1.07%--main div.c:39 (predicted:52.4% cycles:1 iterations:17)
main div.c:44 (predicted:52.4% cycles:1)
main div.c:42 (cycles:2)
compute_flag div.c:28 (cycles:2)
compute_flag div.c:27 (cycles:1)
rand rand.c:28 (cycles:1)
rand rand.c:28 (cycles:1)
__random random.c:298 (cycles:1)
__random random.c:297 (cycles:1)
__random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
__random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
__random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
But the current code is difficult to maintain and extend. This patch
refactors the code for easy maintenance.
Change log
----------
v9: Not changed
v8: Not changed
v7: Not changed
v6: 1. Put the multiline condition code into {} brackets in
counts_str_build()
2. Keep the original display order, that is:
predicted, abort, cycles, iterations
v5: It's a new patch in v5 patch series.
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/util/callchain.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
index b4204b4..abc6908 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
@@ -1214,83 +1214,71 @@ int callchain_branch_counts(struct callchain_root *root,
cycles_count);
}
+static int count_pri64_printf(int index, const char *str, u64 value,
+ char *bf, int bfsize)
+{
+ int printed;
+
+ printed = scnprintf(bf, bfsize,
+ "%s%s:%" PRId64 "",
+ (index) ? " " : " (", str, value);
+
+ return printed;
+}
+
+static int count_float_printf(int index, const char *str, float value,
+ char *bf, int bfsize)
+{
+ int printed;
+
+ printed = scnprintf(bf, bfsize,
+ "%s%s:%.1f%%",
+ (index) ? " " : " (", str, value);
+
+ return printed;
+}
+
static int counts_str_build(char *bf, int bfsize,
u64 branch_count, u64 predicted_count,
u64 abort_count, u64 cycles_count,
u64 iter_count, u64 samples_count)
{
- double predicted_percent = 0.0;
- const char *null_str = "";
- char iter_str[32];
- char cycle_str[32];
- char *istr, *cstr;
u64 cycles;
+ int printed = 0, i = 0;
if (branch_count == 0)
return scnprintf(bf, bfsize, " (calltrace)");
- cycles = cycles_count / branch_count;
-
- if (iter_count && samples_count) {
- if (cycles > 0)
- scnprintf(iter_str, sizeof(iter_str),
- " iterations:%" PRId64 "",
- iter_count / samples_count);
- else
- scnprintf(iter_str, sizeof(iter_str),
- "iterations:%" PRId64 "",
- iter_count / samples_count);
- istr = iter_str;
- } else
- istr = (char *)null_str;
-
- if (cycles > 0) {
- scnprintf(cycle_str, sizeof(cycle_str),
- "cycles:%" PRId64 "", cycles);
- cstr = cycle_str;
- } else
- cstr = (char *)null_str;
-
- predicted_percent = predicted_count * 100.0 / branch_count;
+ if (predicted_count < branch_count) {
+ printed += count_float_printf(i++, "predicted",
+ predicted_count * 100.0 / branch_count,
+ bf + printed, bfsize - printed);
+ }
- if ((predicted_count == branch_count) && (abort_count == 0)) {
- if ((cycles > 0) || (istr != (char *)null_str))
- return scnprintf(bf, bfsize, " (%s%s)", cstr, istr);
- else
- return scnprintf(bf, bfsize, "%s", (char *)null_str);
+ if (abort_count) {
+ printed += count_float_printf(i++, "abort",
+ abort_count * 100.0 / branch_count,
+ bf + printed, bfsize - printed);
}
- if ((predicted_count < branch_count) && (abort_count == 0)) {
- if ((cycles > 0) || (istr != (char *)null_str))
- return scnprintf(bf, bfsize,
- " (predicted:%.1f%% %s%s)",
- predicted_percent, cstr, istr);
- else {
- return scnprintf(bf, bfsize,
- " (predicted:%.1f%%)",
- predicted_percent);
- }
+ cycles = cycles_count / branch_count;
+ if (cycles) {
+ printed += count_pri64_printf(i++, "cycles",
+ cycles,
+ bf + printed, bfsize - printed);
}
- if ((predicted_count == branch_count) && (abort_count > 0)) {
- if ((cycles > 0) || (istr != (char *)null_str))
- return scnprintf(bf, bfsize,
- " (abort:%" PRId64 " %s%s)",
- abort_count, cstr, istr);
- else
- return scnprintf(bf, bfsize,
- " (abort:%" PRId64 ")",
- abort_count);
+ if (iter_count && samples_count) {
+ printed += count_pri64_printf(i++, "iterations",
+ iter_count / samples_count,
+ bf + printed, bfsize - printed);
}
- if ((cycles > 0) || (istr != (char *)null_str))
- return scnprintf(bf, bfsize,
- " (predicted:%.1f%% abort:%" PRId64 " %s%s)",
- predicted_percent, abort_count, cstr, istr);
+ if (i)
+ return scnprintf(bf + printed, bfsize - printed, ")");
- return scnprintf(bf, bfsize,
- " (predicted:%.1f%% abort:%" PRId64 ")",
- predicted_percent, abort_count);
+ bf[0] = 0;
+ return 0;
}
static int callchain_counts_printf(FILE *fp, char *bf, int bfsize,
--
2.7.4
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v9 0/7] perf report: Show branch type Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-17 05:10 +0200
[PATCH v9 6/7] perf report: Show branch type statistics for stdio mode Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-17 05:20 +0200
[PATCH v9 5/7] perf util: Create branch.c/.h for common branch functions Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-17 05:20 +0200
[PATCH v9 7/7] perf report: Show branch type in callchain entry Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-17 05:20 +0200
[PATCH v9 2/7] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-17 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 2/7] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-07-17 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 2/7] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-17 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 2/7] perf/x86/intel: Record branch type Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-18 11:30 +0200
[PATCH v9 4/7] perf report: Refactor the branch info printing code Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-17 05:20 +0200
[PATCH v9 3/7] perf record: Create a new option save_type in --branch-filter Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-17 05:20 +0200
[PATCH v9 1/7] perf/core: Define the common branch type classification Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com> - 2017-07-17 05:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] perf report: Show branch type Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2017-07-17 10:20 +0200
csiph-web