Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1686067

Re: [RFC v5 36/38] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory protection keys

From Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC v5 36/38] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory protection keys
Date 2017-07-13 00:00 +0200
Message-ID <u2xPP-5d7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <u001X-3kP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u001Z-3kP-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <u27iG-5fz-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:33:09AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/05/2017 02:22 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> > Abstracted out the arch specific code into the header file, and
> > added powerpc specific changes.
> > 
> > a) added 4k-backed hpte, memory allocator, powerpc specific.
> > b) added three test case where the key is associated after the page is
> > 	accessed/allocated/mapped.
> > c) cleaned up the code to make checkpatch.pl happy
> 
> There's a *lot* of churn here.  If it breaks, I'm going to have a heck
> of a time figuring out which hunk broke.  Is there any way to break this
> up into a series of things that we have a chance at bisecting?

Just finished breaking down the changes into 20 gradual increments.
I have pushed it to my github tree at

https://github.com/rampai/memorykeys.git
branch is memkey.v6-rc3

See if it works for you. I am sure I would have broken something on
x86 since I dont have a x86 platform to test.

Let me know, Thanks,
RP

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 23:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-10 07:50 +0200
    Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-10 08:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-10 19:20 +0200
  Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-11 17:00 +0200
    Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-11 21:40 +0200
      Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2017-07-12 00:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-12 09:30 +0200
        Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-12 09:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2017-07-13 01:00 +0200
          Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-13 08:30 +0200
  Re: [RFC v5 36/38] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory  protection keys Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-07-11 19:40 +0200
    Re: [RFC v5 36/38] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory  protection keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-13 00:00 +0200

csiph-web