Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1686067
| From | Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v5 36/38] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory protection keys |
| Date | 2017-07-13 00:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u2xPP-5d7-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u001X-3kP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u001Z-3kP-49@gated-at.bofh.it> <u27iG-5fz-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:33:09AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 07/05/2017 02:22 PM, Ram Pai wrote: > > Abstracted out the arch specific code into the header file, and > > added powerpc specific changes. > > > > a) added 4k-backed hpte, memory allocator, powerpc specific. > > b) added three test case where the key is associated after the page is > > accessed/allocated/mapped. > > c) cleaned up the code to make checkpatch.pl happy > > There's a *lot* of churn here. If it breaks, I'm going to have a heck > of a time figuring out which hunk broke. Is there any way to break this > up into a series of things that we have a chance at bisecting? Just finished breaking down the changes into 20 gradual increments. I have pushed it to my github tree at https://github.com/rampai/memorykeys.git branch is memkey.v6-rc3 See if it works for you. I am sure I would have broken something on x86 since I dont have a x86 platform to test. Let me know, Thanks, RP
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 23:40 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-10 07:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-10 08:10 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-10 19:20 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-11 17:00 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-11 21:40 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2017-07-12 00:10 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-12 09:30 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-12 09:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> - 2017-07-13 01:00 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 00/38] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-07-13 08:30 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 36/38] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory protection keys Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-07-11 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 36/38] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory protection keys Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-13 00:00 +0200
csiph-web