Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1685522
| From | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Update cached "current frequency" when limits change |
| Date | 2017-07-12 07:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u2inL-3S5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u2fzz-25Y-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 11-07-17, 19:24, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Currently, the governor calculates the next frequency, set the current CPU
> frequency (policy->cur). It also assumes the current CPU frequency doesn't
> change if the next frequency isn't calculated again and hence caches the
> "current frequency".
>
> However, this isn't true when CPU min/max frequency limits are changed. So,
> there's room for the CPU frequency to get stuck at the wrong level if the
> calculated next frequency doesn't change across multiple limits updates.
>
> Fix this by updating the cached "current frequency" when limits changes the
> current CPU frequency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> index 076a2e3..fe0b2fb 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
>
> busy = sugov_cpu_is_busy(sg_cpu);
>
> + raw_spin_lock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
> if (flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT_DL) {
> next_f = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> } else {
> @@ -240,6 +241,7 @@ static void sugov_update_single(struct update_util_data *hook, u64 time,
> next_f = sg_policy->next_freq;
> }
> sugov_update_commit(sg_policy, time, next_f);
> + raw_spin_unlock(&sg_policy->update_lock);
We wouldn't allow locking here until the time we can :)
> }
>
> static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shared(struct sugov_cpu *sg_cpu, u64 time)
> @@ -637,10 +639,14 @@ static void sugov_stop(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> static void sugov_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> struct sugov_policy *sg_policy = policy->governor_data;
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> if (!policy->fast_switch_enabled) {
> mutex_lock(&sg_policy->work_lock);
> cpufreq_policy_apply_limits(policy);
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&sg_policy->update_lock, flags);
> + sg_policy->next_freq = policy->cur;
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sg_policy->update_lock, flags);
> mutex_unlock(&sg_policy->work_lock);
> }
Did you miss the following part which is after the closing } here ?
sg_policy->need_freq_update = true;
As this should already take care of the problem you are worried about. Or did I
misunderstood your problem completely ?
--
viresh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Update cached "current frequency" when limits change Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-12 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Update cached "current frequency" when limits change Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-12 07:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Update cached "current frequency" when limits change Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-12 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Update cached "current frequency" when limits change Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-14 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: schedutil: Update cached "current frequency" when limits change Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-07-14 06:10 +0200
csiph-web