Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1687025
| From | Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] lustre: check copy_from_iter/copy_to_iter return code |
| Date | 2017-07-14 04:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u2Y3E-4Wx-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u1GBP-5sk-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u2PMK-8mJ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <u2Tnj-23p-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 10:57:59PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Thanks for testing it!
>
> That means we did not copy any data and the kernel continues with
> an uninitialized buffer, right? The problem may be the definition of
>
> struct kib_immediate_msg {
> struct lnet_hdr ibim_hdr; /* portals header */
> char ibim_payload[0]; /* piggy-backed payload */
> } WIRE_ATTR;
>
> The check that Al added will try to ensure that we don't write
> beyond the size of the ibim_payload[] array, which unfortunately
> is defined as a zero-byte array, so I can see why it will now
> fail. However, it's already broken in mainline now, with or without
> my patch.
>
> Are you able to come up with a fix that avoids the warning in
> 'allmodconfig' and makes the function do something reasonable
> again?
Might make sense to try and use valid C99 for "array of indefinite
size as the last member", i.e.
struct kib_immediate_msg {
struct lnet_hdr ibim_hdr; /* portals header */
char ibim_payload[]; /* piggy-backed payload */
} WIRE_ATTR;
Zero-sized array as the last member is gcc hack predating that;
looks like gcc gets confused into deciding that it knows the distance
from the end of object...
Said that, are we really guaranteed the IBLND_MSG_SIZE bytes
in there?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] lustre: check copy_from_iter/copy_to_iter return code Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-07-10 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] lustre: check copy_from_iter/copy_to_iter return code James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2017-07-13 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] lustre: check copy_from_iter/copy_to_iter return code Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-07-13 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] lustre: check copy_from_iter/copy_to_iter return code Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> - 2017-07-14 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] lustre: check copy_from_iter/copy_to_iter return code James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> - 2017-07-15 16:50 +0200
csiph-web