Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1686356
| From | Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma |
| Date | 2017-07-13 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u2Hma-34F-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u001X-3kP-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u001Y-3kP-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <u27Vp-5Hk-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 11:13:56AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/05/2017 02:22 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> > +void arch_show_smap(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > +{
> > + seq_printf(m, "ProtectionKey: %8u\n", vma_pkey(vma));
> > +}
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_PPC64_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS */
>
> This seems like kinda silly unnecessary duplication. Could we just put
> this in the fs/proc/ code and #ifdef it on ARCH_HAS_PKEYS?
Well x86 predicates it based on availability of X86_FEATURE_OSPKE.
powerpc doesn't need that check or any similar check. So trying to
generalize the code does not save much IMHO.
maybe have a seperate inline function that does
seq_printf(m, "ProtectionKey: %8u\n", vma_pkey(vma));
and is called from x86 and powerpc's arch_show_smap()?
At least will keep the string format captured in
one single place.
thoughts?
RP
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 23:30 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-10 05:10 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-10 08:10 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-07-11 20:20 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-13 10:10 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> - 2017-07-13 16:10 +0200
Re: [RFC v5 34/38] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com> - 2017-07-13 19:10 +0200
csiph-web