Re: [patch] autogain support for bayer10 format (was Re: [patch] propagating controls in libv4l2)

From	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [patch] autogain support for bayer10 format (was Re: [patch] propagating controls in libv4l2)
Date	2017-07-13 10:00 +0200
Message-ID	<u2Hcv-2Mh-47@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <tAt9f-1vX-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAvb4-2OA-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAxmy-4e9-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAE4F-mI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tAKD7-4DF-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi!

> Oh, somehow I got confused that this is kernel code :)
> 
> >But I'd say NEON conversion is not neccessary anytime soon. First,
> >this is just trying to get average luminosity. We can easily skip
> >quite a lot of pixels, and still get reasonable answer.
> >
> >Second, omap3isp actually has a hardware block computing statistics
> >for us. We just don't use it for simplicity.
> >
> 
> Right, I forgot about that.
> 
> >(But if you want to play with camera, I'll get you patches; there's
> >ton of work to be done, both kernel and userspace :-).
> 
> Well, I saw a low hanging fruit I thought I can convert to NEON in a day or
> two, while having some rest from the huge "project" I am devoting all my
> spare time recently (rebasing hildon/maemo 5 on top of devuan Jessie).
> Still, if there is something relatively small to be done, just email me and
> I'll have a look.

Well, there's a ton of work on camera, and some work on
libcmtspeechdata. The later is rather self-contained.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [patch] autogain support for bayer10 format (was Re: [patch]  propagating controls in libv4l2) Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2017-07-13 10:00 +0200

csiph-web