Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1682772
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] trace-cmd: replace show_file() -> show_instance_file() |
| Date | 2017-07-07 00:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u0nrB-3is-59@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tOWEp-193-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tOWEq-193-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 5 Jun 2017 11:31:18 +0200 Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> wrote: > show_file(name) and show_instance_file(&top_instance, name) are > equivalent. > > Remove the show_file() function in order to have a single function for > this task. Actually I find nothing wrong with having a helper function like this. IIRC, show_file() was first, and then show_instance_file() came later. There's some files that only exist for the top_instance, and I like the fact that this is annotated that way. I'm curious to know what the benefit of removing show_file() is? -- Steve > > Signed-off-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> > --- > trace-list.c | 21 ++++++--------------- > trace-local.h | 2 -- > trace-show.c | 18 ++---------------- > trace-snapshot.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) \
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 2/2] trace-cmd: replace show_file() -> show_instance_file() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-07 00:30 +0200 Re: [PATCH 2/2] trace-cmd: replace show_file() -> show_instance_file() Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it> - 2017-07-10 02:20 +0200
csiph-web