Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1683241
| From | Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/5] powernv:idle: Move initialization of sibling pacas to pnv_alloc_idle_core_states |
| Date | 2017-07-07 17:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u0D3j-5J4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tZVvk-dV-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tZVvl-dV-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <u0gJr-6NU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:16:09AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:08:15 +0530
> "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > From: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> > On POWER9 DD1, in order to get around a hardware issue, we store in
> > every CPU thread's paca the paca pointers of all its siblings.
> >
> > Move this code into pnv_alloc_idle_core_states() soon after the space
> > for saving the sibling pacas is allocated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> > - if (cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_POWER9_DD1)) {
> > - int cpu;
> > -
> > - pr_info("powernv: idle: Saving PACA pointers of all CPUs in their thread sibling PACA\n");
> > - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > - int base_cpu = cpu_first_thread_sibling(cpu);
> > - int idx = cpu_thread_in_core(cpu);
> > - int i;
> > -
>
> You could move the thread_sibling_pacas allocation to here?
>
> Speaking of which... core_idle_state and thread_sibling_pacas are
> allocated with kmalloc_node... What happens if we take an SLB miss
> in the idle wakeup code on these guys? Nothing good I think. Perhaps
> we should put them into the pacas or somewhere in bolted memory.
Yes, though the SLB miss hasn't yet been encountered in practise so
far!
While one can define thread_sibling_pacas in PACA, it doesn't make
sense to allocate space for core_idle_state in PACA since the
allocated value of the secondary threads will never be used.
What is the right way to ensure that these allocations fall in the
bolted range ?
>
> Good cleanup though.
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/5] powernv:idle: Cleanup idle states initialization "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 18:40 +0200
[PATCH 3/5] powernv:idle: Define idle init function for power8 "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/5] powernv:idle: Define idle init function for power8 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/5] powernv:idle: Define idle init function for power8 Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-07 14:50 +0200
[PATCH 5/5] powernv:idle: Disable LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT states when stop-api fails. "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/5] powernv:idle: Disable LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT states when stop-api fails. Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/5] powernv:idle: Disable LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT states when stop-api fails. Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-07 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/5] powernv:idle: Disable LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT states when stop-api fails. Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 5/5] powernv:idle: Disable LOSE_FULL_CONTEXT states when stop-api fails. Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-11 07:10 +0200
[PATCH 2/5] powernv:idle: Change return type of pnv_probe_idle_states to int "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/5] powernv:idle: Change return type of pnv_probe_idle_states to int Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/5] powernv:idle: Change return type of pnv_probe_idle_states to int Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-07 14:40 +0200
[PATCH 1/5] powernv:idle: Move device-tree parsing to one place. "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] powernv:idle: Move device-tree parsing to one place. Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] powernv:idle: Move device-tree parsing to one place. Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-07 13:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/5] powernv:idle: Move device-tree parsing to one place. Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 10:50 +0200
[PATCH 4/5] powernv:idle: Move initialization of sibling pacas to pnv_alloc_idle_core_states "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-05 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/5] powernv:idle: Move initialization of sibling pacas to pnv_alloc_idle_core_states Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-06 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/5] powernv:idle: Move initialization of sibling pacas to pnv_alloc_idle_core_states Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-07 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/5] powernv:idle: Move initialization of sibling pacas to pnv_alloc_idle_core_states Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> - 2017-07-08 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/5] powernv:idle: Move initialization of sibling pacas to pnv_alloc_idle_core_states Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2017-07-10 06:40 +0200
csiph-web