Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1682032
| From | Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support |
| Date | 2017-07-06 05:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u05XI-7aa-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <tZEXw-6cG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tZWUq-1gP-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tZZpf-2RM-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u00bF-3nZ-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <u00EF-3NZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 11:59:33PM +0200, Mason wrote: > On 05/07/2017 23:34, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 10:39:19PM +0200, Mason wrote: > > > >> On 05/07/2017 20:03, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > If you confirm that > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/commit/?h=pci/host-tango&id=d752a8b29345 > > works for you, I'll include it in my v4.13 pull request. > > There were a few nits I wanted to address: > > - Since we added suppress_bind_attrs = true, probe() > can only be called at init, so I wanted to mark __init > all the probe functions, to save space. > > - I left the definition of MSI_MAX in the wrong patch > > - You put a pointer to the pdev in the struct tango_pcie. > I think this is redundant, since the pdev already has a > pointer to the struct, as drvdata. > So I wanted to change tango_msi_probe() to take a pdev > as argument (to make it more like an actual probe function) > and derive pcie from pdev, instead of the other way around. I don't think tango_msi_probe() is really a "probe" function. It's all part of the tango driver, and it's not claiming a separate piece of hardware. So I would keep the name and structure similar to these: advk_pcie_init_msi_irq_domain() nwl_pcie_init_msi_irq_domain() BTW, those functions use irq_domain_add_linear(), while you are one of the very few callers of irq_domain_create_linear(). Why the difference? If your code does basically the same thing, it's very helpful to me if it *looks* basically the same. > Can I send you a patch series with these changes on Friday? I was planning to ask Linus to pull my branch tomorrow or Friday because I'm going on vacation next week and I don't want to leave right after he pulls it. So the sooner the better. Bjorn
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-07-04 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-07-05 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-07-05 20:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-07-05 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-07-05 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-07-06 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-07-06 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr> - 2017-07-06 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-06 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v9 0/3] Tango PCIe controller support Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> - 2017-07-06 21:50 +0200
csiph-web