Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1629001
| From | SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: s3c24xx: Use devm_kcalloc() in s3c24xx_dma_probe() |
| Date | 2017-04-23 13:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tznIB-7LL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tzaLn-81z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzaLn-81z-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tzmCR-794-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tznfA-7mZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tznfA-7mZ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
>> WARNING: Prefer devm_kcalloc over devm_kzalloc with multiply > For example. Also I just noticed some previous comment by Krzysztof that > pointed that out already. > > My suggestion: One sentence describing that the current situation is. Why do you find the sentence for the multiplication information inappropriate (or incomplete) at the moment? > Another sentence explaining why this is bad/undesirable. Which details do you miss here? > In this case, the output of the checkpatch script would come in handy. Its implementation of the check “ALLOC_WITH_MULTIPLY” considers only an other search pattern so far. * Do you find it worthwhile to add a prefix like “devm_” to the used regular expression? * Would like to improve any related scripts for the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software) a bit more? > With this, you avoid cramming every information into one long and > complicated sentence. Thanks for your feedback about other wording preferences. Regards, Markus
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/2] dmaengine: s3c24xx: Fine-tuning for s3c24xx_dma_probe() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-04-22 23:30 +0200
[PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: s3c24xx: Use devm_kcalloc() in s3c24xx_dma_probe() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-04-22 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: s3c24xx: Use devm_kcalloc() in s3c24xx_dma_probe() Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de> - 2017-04-23 12:10 +0200
Re: s3c24xx: Use devm_kcalloc() in s3c24xx_dma_probe() Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de> - 2017-04-23 12:50 +0200
Re: s3c24xx: Use devm_kcalloc() in s3c24xx_dma_probe() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-04-23 13:20 +0200
Re: s3c24xx: Use devm_kcalloc() in s3c24xx_dma_probe() Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de> - 2017-04-23 14:20 +0200
Re: s3c24xx: Use devm_kcalloc() in s3c24xx_dma_probe() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-04-23 14:40 +0200
Re: s3c24xx: Use devm_kcalloc() in s3c24xx_dma_probe() SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-04-23 12:50 +0200
[PATCH 2/2] dmaengine: s3c24xx: Fix a typo in a comment line SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2017-04-22 23:30 +0200
csiph-web