Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree

From	Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree
Date	2017-04-24 20:10 +0200
Message-ID	<tzQAW-1Uk-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <tyAyd-2xG-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyDcL-492-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyNYt-2gR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyOBc-2u9-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyOKS-2xl-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 04/21/2017 04:54 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> +Dave,
>
> On 4/21/2017 2:44 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 11:02 PM, santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com
>> <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/21/17 2:31 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> arm-soc/next/drivers:
>>>> ae3874cc931b ARM: keystone: Drop PM domain support for k2g
>>>> 52835d59fc6c soc: ti: Add ti_sci_pm_domains driver
>>>> 7cc119f29b19 dt-bindings: Add TI SCI PM Domains
>>>> 213ec7fed302 PM / Domains: Do not check if simple providers have phandle
>>>> cells
>>>> a5ea7a0fcbd7 PM / Domains: Add generic data pointer to genpd data struct
>>>>
>>> Above are the correct git object for which I sent pull request for.
>>
>> Ok, good, thanks for checking! They are however the commits that
>> contain the silly https://urldefense.proofpoint.com URLs. Can you
>> send a follow-up patch to fix these and use the regular
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.ti.org&d=DwIBaQ&c=RoP1YumCXCgaWHvlZYR8PQcxBKCX5YTpkKY057SbK10&r=XBn1JQGPwR8CsE7xpP3wPlG6DQU7qw8ym65xieNZ4hY&m=vFHOEb7p2FxbH00YRQq4WnRiu2BKHADn0gl6e6DoNFQ&s=7mfiIp2Ywy9_ppWKjEGlrswiKRndv8_I7zGVF9uyT0w&e=
>>
>> URL that is in linux-next?
>>
> Dave,
> Any reason you changed these URLs in last version ?
> Can you please fixup these URLs to along with DT defines.

I didn't change any of the URLs in the patches, I am not sure what those URLs 
are. In the patches I sent the URLs are fine, and I see them normal on patchwork 
too: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9660785/

Is there something that automatically changes those? I don't want to send 
another patch for it to just get mangled again.

Regards,
Dave

>
> Regards,
> Santosh

Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-04-21 03:00 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-21 08:00 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree "santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> - 2017-04-21 08:50 +0200
      Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-21 11:40 +0200
        Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree "santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com" <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> - 2017-04-21 23:10 +0200
          Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-04-21 23:40 +0200
            Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> - 2017-04-22 00:00 +0200
          Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-21 23:50 +0200
            Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> - 2017-04-22 00:00 +0200
              Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com> - 2017-04-24 20:10 +0200
                Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the arm-soc tree Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com> - 2017-04-24 20:30 +0200

csiph-web