Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1627902
| From | Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. |
| Date | 2017-04-21 03:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tyvyx-7Vc-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tsODU-f3-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <txU5X-1Gt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyfN8-6Do-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyl6a-1yM-35@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Roger,
On 04/20/2017 07:11 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Some boards [1] leave the PHYs at an invalid state
> during system power-up or reset thus causing unreliability
> issues with the PHY which manifests as PHY not being detected
> or link not functional. To fix this, these PHYs need to be RESET
> via a GPIO connected to the PHY's RESET pin.
>
> Some boards have a single GPIO controlling the PHY RESET pin of all
> PHYs on the bus whereas some others have separate GPIOs controlling
> individual PHY RESETs.
>
> In both cases, the RESET de-assertion cannot be done in the PHY driver
> as the PHY will not probe till its reset is de-asserted.
> So do the RESET de-assertion in the MDIO bus driver.
>
> [1] - am572x-idk, am571x-idk, a437x-idk
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
A few comments on the binding and the code, sorry for this late review.
> +Example :
> +This example shows these optional properties, plus other properties
> +required for the TI Davinci MDIO driver.
> +
> + davinci_mdio: ethernet@0x5c030000 {
> + compatible = "ti,davinci_mdio";
> + reg = <0x5c030000 0x1000>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + reset-gpios = <&gpio2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + reset-delay-us = <2>; /* PHY datasheet states 1uS min */
us is micro seconds, uS is micro siemens.
> +
> + ethphy0: ethernet-phy@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ethphy1: ethernet-phy@3 {
> + reg = <3>;
> + };
> + };
>
> + /* de-assert bus level PHY GPIO resets */
> + for (i = 0; i < bus->num_reset_gpios; i++) {
> + gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_index(&bus->dev, "reset", i,
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(gpiod);
> + if (err != -ENOENT) {
> + pr_err("mii_bus %s couldn't get reset GPIO\n",
> + bus->id);
Could we use dev_err(&bus->dev) here to better identify which MDIO bus
is returning the problem?
> + return err;
Should we somehow "unwind" the reset lines we were able to successfully
take out of reset and therefore put back into reset state? How about
mdiobus_unregister()? Should we have similar code there, if not for
correctness to be more power efficient?
> + }
> + } else {
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 1);
> + udelay(bus->reset_delay_us);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 0);
Does that work even if the polarity of the reset line is active low?
Thanks!
--
Florian
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-04-19 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-04-19 13:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-04-19 14:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-04-19 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-04-20 10:00 +0200
[PATCH v2] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-04-20 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-04-20 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-04-20 16:00 +0200
[PATCH v3 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-04-20 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-04-21 03:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 03:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-04-21 03:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-04-21 10:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-04-21 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de> - 2017-04-21 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-04-24 01:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> - 2017-04-24 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-04-24 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] mdio_bus: Issue GPIO RESET to PHYs. David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-04-24 18:50 +0200
csiph-web