Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1627777

Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6?

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 3:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>> The original gcc-4.3 release was in early 2008. If we decide to still
>>>> support that, we probably want the first 10 quirks in this series,
>>>> while gcc-4.6 (released in 2011) requires none of them.
>>
>> I'd be in support of raising the minimum to gcc 4.6. (I'd actually
>> prefer 4.7, just to avoid some 4.6 packaging issues, and for better
>> gcc plugin support.)
>>
>> I'm curious what gcc 4.6 binaries are common in the wild besides
>> old-stable Debian (unsupported in maybe a year from now?) and 12.04
>> Ubuntu (going fully unsupported in 2 weeks). It looks like 4.6 was
>> used only in Fedora 15 and 16 (both EOL).
>
> I think we are better off defining two versions: One that we know
> a lot of people care about, and we actively try to make that work
> well in all configurations (e.g. 4.6, 4.7 or 4.8), fixing all warnings
> we run into, and an older version that we try not to break
> intentionally (e.g. 3.4, 4.1 or 4.3) but that we only fix when
> someone actually runs into a problem they can't work around
> by upgrading to a more modern compiler.

For "working well everywhere" I feel like 4.8 is the better of those
three (I'd prefer 4.9). I think we should avoid 4.6 -- it seems not
widely used.

For an old compiler... yikes. 3.4 sounds insane to me. :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-16 22:00 +0200
  Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-20 12:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-20 22:00 +0200
      Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-21 23:00 +0200
        Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-21 23:10 +0200
          Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> - 2017-04-22 05:20 +0200
            Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-22 17:40 +0200
              Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-04-23 22:20 +0200
                Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-24 11:50 +0200
                Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-04-24 12:20 +0200
                Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-24 16:20 +0200
                Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> - 2017-04-24 19:00 +0200
                Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-24 19:40 +0200
                Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-04-24 20:20 +0200
                Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> - 2017-04-24 20:40 +0200
                Re: [RFC] minimum gcc version for kernel: raise to gcc-4.3 or 4.6? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-04-24 22:40 +0200

csiph-web