Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1627572
| From | <Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree |
| Date | 2017-04-20 17:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tylIS-1Nt-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ty6qu-Hv-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the at91 tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-tse850-3.dts
> between commit:
>
> e67cedc92812 ("ARM: dts: at91: add envelope detector mux to the Axentia TSE-850")
>
> from the arm-soc tree and commit:
>
> 29dd89418007 ("ARM: dts: at91: add envelope detector mux to the Axentia TSE-850")
>
> from the at91 tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the arm-soc tree version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
Stephen,
Yes, the use of arm-soc version was the way to go. I now have updated my at91-next tree to match Alexandre's pull-request and hope it is not in conflict anymore.
Thanks for your fix.
Best regards,
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-04-20 00:40 +0200 RE: linux-next: manual merge of the at91 tree with the arm-soc tree <Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com> - 2017-04-20 17:00 +0200
csiph-web