Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1628485

Re: [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status printing

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/21/2017 6:21 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 05:05:15PM -0600, Tyler Baicar wrote:
>> The ACPI 6.1 spec added a timestamp to the HEST generic data
> HEST?
>
> I see the timestamp in
>
> Table 18-343 Generic Error Data Entry
>
> where those things are "One or more Generic Error Data Entry structures
> may be recorded in the Generic Error Data Entries field of the Generic
> Error Status Block structure."
>
> And those are part of the "18.3.2.7 Generic Hardware Error Source",
> i.e., GHES. So why do you say "HEST" above?
Ah yes, this should be GHES no HEST. There are too many acronyms 
involved here :)
>
>> structure. Print the timestamp out when printing out the error
>> status information.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org>
>> CC: Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang <zjzhang@codeaurora.org>
>> Reviewed-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Remove those Reviewed-by:s
>
>> ---
>>   drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> index 8328a6f..46585f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
>> @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@
>>   #include <linux/acpi.h>
>>   #include <linux/pci.h>
>>   #include <linux/aer.h>
>> +#include <linux/printk.h>
>> +#include <linux/bcd.h>
>>   #include <acpi/ghes.h>
>>   
>>   #define INDENT_SP	" "
>> @@ -387,6 +389,29 @@ static void cper_print_pcie(const char *pfx, const struct cper_sec_pcie *pcie,
>>   	pfx, pcie->bridge.secondary_status, pcie->bridge.control);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void cper_estatus_timestamp(const char *pfx,
> cper_print_tstamp()
>
>> +				   struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *gdata)
>> +{
>> +	__u8 hour, min, sec, day, mon, year, century, *timestamp;
>> +
>> +	if (gdata->validation_bits & ACPI_HEST_GEN_VALID_TIMESTAMP) {
>> +		timestamp = (__u8 *)&(gdata->time_stamp);
>> +		sec       = bcd2bin(timestamp[0]);
>> +		min       = bcd2bin(timestamp[1]);
>> +		hour      = bcd2bin(timestamp[2]);
>> +		day       = bcd2bin(timestamp[4]);
>> +		mon       = bcd2bin(timestamp[5]);
>> +		year      = bcd2bin(timestamp[6]);
>> +		century   = bcd2bin(timestamp[7]);
>> +
>> +		if (*(timestamp + 3) & 0x1)
>> +			printk("%stimestamp is precise\n", pfx);
>> +
>> +		printk("%stime: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
>> +			century, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
> Yeah, about the precise tstamp, you can do something like this:
>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> index 46585f92b741..a649884e2264 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/cper.c
> @@ -404,10 +404,8 @@ static void cper_estatus_timestamp(const char *pfx,
>   		year      = bcd2bin(timestamp[6]);
>   		century   = bcd2bin(timestamp[7]);
>   
> -		if (*(timestamp + 3) & 0x1)
> -			printk("%stimestamp is precise\n", pfx);
> -
> -		printk("%stime: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
> +		printk("%s%ststamp: %02d%02d-%02d-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n", pfx,
> +			(timestamp[3] & 0x1 ? "precise " : ""),
>   			century, year, mon, day, hour, min, sec);
>   	}
>   }
This is basically what I already had in v14...you asked to move it into 
a different if-statement? https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/12/397

Thanks,
Tyler

-- 
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH V15 00/11] Add UEFI 2.6 and ACPI 6.1 updates for RAS on ARM64 Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-19 01:10 +0200
  [PATCH V15 04/11] efi: parse ARM processor error Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-19 01:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V15 04/11] efi: parse ARM processor error Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-21 20:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V15 04/11] efi: parse ARM processor error "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-21 20:30 +0200
        Re: [PATCH V15 04/11] efi: parse ARM processor error Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-24 20:00 +0200
  [PATCH V15 05/11] arm64: exception: handle Synchronous External Abort Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-19 01:10 +0200
  [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status printing Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-19 01:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status  printing Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-21 14:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status  printing Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-21 20:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status  printing "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-21 20:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status  printing Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-21 20:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH V15 03/11] cper: add timestamp print to CPER status  printing "Baicar, Tyler" <tbaicar@codeaurora.org> - 2017-04-21 20:50 +0200

csiph-web