Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility

From	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility
Date	2017-04-21 15:20 +0200
Message-ID	<tyGDE-6gr-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<txIxP-2AU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyqyR-4WM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyqIy-504-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <tyr1T-565-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 04/20/2017 10:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:14:37 +0100
> 
>> I agree, except I don't think you're going far enough. Those "standard
>> names" you mention... some of this stuff actually depends on __GLIBC__,
>> and *that* isn't right either.
> 
> Yep, that's something that needs correcting.
> 
Should all libc implementations define __GLIBC__ or could we at least
switch the kernel UAPI to !__KERNEL__ here?

Hauke

Thread

[PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> - 2017-04-18 23:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-04-20 22:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> - 2017-04-20 22:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-04-20 22:40 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> - 2017-04-21 15:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc compatibility David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> - 2017-04-21 15:20 +0200
          Re: [musl] Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] uapi glibc compat: fix musl libc  compatibility Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> - 2017-04-21 20:50 +0200

csiph-web