Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1624889
| From | John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: bug? dwc2: insufficient fifo memory |
| Date | 2017-04-18 00:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <txntn-6u0-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tewQx-6Yh-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:46 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hey John,
> So after the USB tree landed in 4.11-rc, I've been seeing the
> following warning at bootup.
>
> It seems the fifo_mem/total_fifo_size value on hikey is 1920, but I'm
> seeing the addresses zip upward quickly as the txfsz values are all
> 2048. Not exactly sure whats wrong here. Things still seem to work
> properly.
>
> thanks
> -john
>
>
> [ 8.944987] dwc2 f72c0000.usb: bound driver configfs-gadget
> [ 8.956651] insufficient fifo memory
> [ 8.956703] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 8.964906] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1 at drivers/usb/dwc2/gadget.c:330
> dwc2_hsotg_init_fifo+0x1a8/0x1c8
Hey John,
So I finally got a bit of time to look deeper into this, and it
seems like this issue was introduced by commit 3c6aea7344c3 ("usb:
dwc2: gadget: Add checking for g-tx-fifo-size parameter"), as that
change added the following snippit:
if (hsotg->params.g_tx_fifo_size[fifo] < min ||
hsotg->params.g_tx_fifo_size[fifo] > dptxfszn) {
dev_warn(hsotg->dev, "%s: Invalid parameter
g_tx_fifo_size[%d]=%d\n",
__func__, fifo,
hsotg->params.g_tx_fifo_size[fifo]);
hsotg->params.g_tx_fifo_size[fifo] = dptxfszn;
}
On HiKey, we have g-tx-fifo-size = <128 128 128 128 128 128> in the
dtsi, and the fifo_mem value ends up initialized at 1920.
Unfortunately, in the above, it sees other entries in the
g_tx_fifo_size[] array are initialized to zero, which then causes them
to be set to the "default" value of dptxfszn which is 2048. So then
later in dwc2_hsotg_init_fifo() the addr value (which adds the
fifo_size array value each step) quickly grows beyond the fifo_mem
value, causing the warning.
Not sure what the right fix is here? Should the min value be used
instead of the "default" dptxfszn value? Again, I'm not sure I see
any side-effects from this warning, but wanted to try to figure out
how to fix it properly.
thanks
-john
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: bug? dwc2: insufficient fifo memory John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> - 2017-04-18 00:40 +0200
csiph-web