Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1624761
| From | Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vfio/type1: Prune vfio_pin_page_external() |
| Date | 2017-04-17 19:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <txiDn-3sK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tx3XH-2FQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tx3XH-2FQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tx8NI-5UK-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:54:21 +0800 Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 07:42:39PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote: > > With vfio_lock_acct() testing the locked memory limit under mmap_sem, > > it's redundant to do it here for a single page. We can also reorder > > our tests such that we can avoid testing for reserved pages if we're > > not doing accounting, and test the process CAP_IPC_LOCK only if we > > are doing accounting. Finally, this function oddly returns 1 on > > success. Update to return zero on success, -errno on error. Since > > the function only pins a single page, there's no need to return the > > number of pages pinned. > > > > N.B. vfio_pin_pages_remote() can pin a large contiguous range of pages > > before calling vfio_lock_acct(). If we were to similarly remove the > > extra test there, a user could temporarily pin far more pages than > > they're allowed. > > > > Suggested-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> > > Suggested-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> > > Maybe this suggested-by honor should be for Kirti only? :) Sorry, I mis-attributed this, Eric suggested that vfio_pin_page_external() should have a standard return value. I'll change the Suggested-by. > For the patch, I think it's good to me as long as we have the > accounting check in vfio_lock_acct() which is just introduced in > previous patch, so: > > Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Thanks!
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v4 0/2] vfio/type1: Synchronous locked page accounting Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-04-17 03:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 2/2] vfio/type1: Prune vfio_pin_page_external() Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-04-17 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vfio/type1: Prune vfio_pin_page_external() Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> - 2017-04-17 09:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vfio/type1: Prune vfio_pin_page_external() Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-04-17 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] vfio/type1: Prune vfio_pin_page_external() Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-04-17 21:20 +0200
[PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-04-17 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> - 2017-04-17 08:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-04-17 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-04-17 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-04-17 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-04-17 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> - 2017-04-17 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> - 2017-04-18 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] vfio/type1: Remove locked page accounting workqueue Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com> - 2017-04-18 20:30 +0200
csiph-web