Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1625975
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model |
| Date | 2017-04-19 11:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <txUpk-1NP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <txEue-8r4-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <txEuf-8r4-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <txTMC-1zl-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > +done: > > + raw_spin_unlock(&group->lock); > > + return nextevt; > > +} > > Would it be very onerous to rewrite that into regular loops? That avoids > us having to think (and worry) about blowing our stack. The issue is that this is walking a hierarchy tree (limited depth) and not a list of groups at a particular level. In an earlier version we checked the stack usage and it was ~128 bytes per nest level. With 32k CPUs this ends up with maximum 5 recursions, i.e. 640 bytes. I recheck with the current implementation. Thanks, tglx
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[patch V2 00/10] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-18 18:50 +0200
[patch V2 06/10] timer: Restructure internal locking Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-18 18:50 +0200
Re: [patch V2 06/10] timer: Restructure internal locking Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 09:10 +0200
[patch V2 10/10] timer: Always queue timers on the local CPU Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-18 18:50 +0200
[patch V2 07/10] tick/sched: Split out jiffies update helper function Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-18 18:50 +0200
[patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-18 18:50 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 09:30 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 09:30 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 09:40 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 09:40 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 10:20 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 10:40 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-19 11:10 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-19 10:40 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 11:00 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 11:10 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 11:50 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 12:00 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-19 11:50 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 12:00 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 11:30 +0200
Re: [patch V2 08/10] timer: Implement the hierarchical pull model Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 12:30 +0200
[patch V2 05/10] timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers seperately Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-18 18:50 +0200
Re: [patch V2 05/10] timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers seperately Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-19 09:10 +0200
Re: [patch V2 05/10] timer: Retrieve next expiry of pinned/non-pinned timers seperately Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-19 12:00 +0200
[patch V2 04/10] timer: Keep the pinned timers separate from the others Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-18 18:50 +0200
Re: [patch V2 00/10] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a pull at expiry model "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-21 21:30 +0200
csiph-web