Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1625671
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/mce: Check MCi_STATUS[MISCV] for usable addr on Intel only |
| Date | 2017-04-19 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <txJDz-3bW-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <txGcG-140-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <txIRc-2HH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:26:03PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> We definitely don't need to look at MiscV.
>
> But the value in MCA_ADDR isn't necessarily a system physical address. It can be,
> or it can be a normalized address in the case of UMCs, or it can a set/way for caches.
> So it depends on the bank type and error type.
Right, this is all future work. mce_usable_address() would need some
beefing up then.
> All this may just be for SMCA systems though. I need to double check.
Thanks!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] x86/mce: Check MCi_STATUS[MISCV] for usable addr on Intel only Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2017-04-18 20:40 +0200
RE: [RFC PATCH] x86/mce: Check MCi_STATUS[MISCV] for usable addr on Intel only "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com> - 2017-04-18 23:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] x86/mce: Check MCi_STATUS[MISCV] for usable addr on Intel only Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-04-19 00:20 +0200
[tip:ras/core] x86/mce: Check MCi_STATUS[MISCV] for usable addr on Intel only tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-04-19 12:20 +0200
csiph-web