Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1622379
| From | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains |
| Date | 2017-04-12 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tvtWi-7dn-35@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tn1Xc-2Jd-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <tn4V5-4Nu-51@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | ARM |
On 20/03/17 09:32, Viresh Kumar wrote:
[...]
> +
> +Example 7: domain-Performance-state:
> +(example: For 1GHz require domain state 1 and for 1.1 & 1.2 GHz require state 2)
> +
> +/ {
> + domain_opp_table: opp_table0 {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> +
> + opp@1 {
> + domain-performance-state = <1>;
> + opp-microvolt = <975000 970000 985000>;
> + };
> + opp@2 {
> + domain-performance-state = <2>;
> + opp-microvolt = <1075000 1000000 1085000>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + foo_domain: power-controller@12340000 {
> + compatible = "foo,power-controller";
> + reg = <0x12340000 0x1000>;
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + operating-points-v2 = <&domain_opp_table>;
> + }
> +
> + cpu0_opp_table: opp_table1 {
> + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> + opp-shared;
> +
> + opp@1000000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
> + domain-performance-state = <1>;
> + };
> + opp@1100000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1100000000>;
> + domain-performance-state = <2>;
> + };
> + opp@1200000000 {
> + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1200000000>;
> + domain-performance-state = <2>;
> + };
> + };
> +
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + cpu@0 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9";
> + reg = <0>;
> + clocks = <&clk_controller 0>;
> + clock-names = "cpu";
> + operating-points-v2 = <&cpu0_opp_table>;
> + power-domains = <&foo_domain>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
Thinking more about this above example, I think you need more
explanation. So in the above case you have cpu with clock controller,
power-domain and the OPP table info, I can think of few things that need
to be explicit:
1. How does the precedence look like ?
2. Since power-domains with OPP table control the performance state, do
we ignore clock and operating-points-v2 in the above case completely?
3. Will the power-domain drive the OPP ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-12 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-13 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-13 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-17 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2017-04-18 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH V4 1/9] PM / OPP: Allow OPP table to be used for power-domains Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-19 12:20 +0200
csiph-web