Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1620701
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v2][PATCH 04/11] x86: Implement __arch_rare_write_begin/unmap() |
| Date | 2017-04-10 22:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tuNX3-5AE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tqqml-2iB-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttQaB-wo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttQNj-YJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <turDb-7Lg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tuNX3-5AE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 1:24 PM, PaX Team <pageexec@freemail.hu> wrote: >> On 7 Apr 2017 at 22:07, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> No one has explained how CR0.WP is weaker or slower than my proposal. >> >> you misunderstood, Daniel was talking about your use_mm approach. >> >>> Here's what I'm proposing: >>> >>> At boot, choose a random address A. >> >> what is the threat that a random address defends against? >> >>> Create an mm_struct that has a >>> single VMA starting at A that represents the kernel's rarely-written >>> section. Compute O = (A - VA of rarely-written section). To do a >>> rare write, use_mm() the mm, write to (VA + O), then unuse_mm(). >> >> the problem is that the amount of __read_only data extends beyond vmlinux, >> i.e., this approach won't scale. another problem is that it can't be used >> inside use_mm and switch_mm themselves (no read-only task structs or percpu >> pgd for you ;) and probably several other contexts. > > These are the limitations that concern me: what will we NOT be able to > make read-only as a result of the use_mm() design choice? My RFC > series included a simple case and a constify case, but I did not > include things like making page tables read-only, etc. If we make page tables read-only, we may need to have multiple levels of rareness. Page table writes aren't all that rare, and I can imagine distros configuring the kernel so that static structs full of function pointers are read-only (IMO that should be the default or even mandatory), but page tables may be a different story. That being said, CR3-twiddling to write to page tables could actually work. Hmm.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v2][PATCH 04/11] x86: Implement __arch_rare_write_begin/unmap() Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-10 22:20 +0200 Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v2][PATCH 04/11] x86: Implement __arch_rare_write_begin/unmap() Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-04-10 22:20 +0200
csiph-web