Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1620503
| From | Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@microsoft.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH 6/7] x86/hyper-v: use hypercall for remove TLB flush |
| Date | 2017-04-10 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tuLsg-3QQ-93@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ttAfw-6oW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttAfx-6oW-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <tu1IJ-7Ki-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tuINI-1Y2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@redhat.com] > > We may be supporting more than 64 CPUs in this hypercall. I am going > > to inquire with the Windows folks and get back to you. > > Thanks! It is even specified in the specification: > "Future versions of the hypervisor may support more than 64 virtual > processors per partition. In that case, a new field will be added to the flags > value that allows the caller to define the “processor bank” to which the > processor mask applies." > > We, however, need to know where to put this in flags. Would the HvFlushVirtualAddressListEx hypercall do? Is there a doc update/clarification needed? Regards, Jork
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
RE: [PATCH 6/7] x86/hyper-v: use hypercall for remove TLB flush Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-10 19:40 +0200
csiph-web