Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1620503

RE: [PATCH 6/7] x86/hyper-v: use hypercall for remove TLB flush

From Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@microsoft.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [PATCH 6/7] x86/hyper-v: use hypercall for remove TLB flush
Date 2017-04-10 19:40 +0200
Message-ID <tuLsg-3QQ-93@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ttAfw-6oW-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttAfx-6oW-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <tu1IJ-7Ki-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tuINI-1Y2-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@redhat.com]

> > We may be supporting more than 64 CPUs in this hypercall. I am going
> > to inquire with the Windows folks and get back to you.
> 
> Thanks! It is even specified in the specification:
> "Future versions of the hypervisor may support more than 64 virtual
> processors per partition. In that case, a new field will be added to the flags
> value that allows the caller to define the “processor bank” to which the
> processor mask applies."
> 
> We, however, need to know where to put this in flags.

Would the HvFlushVirtualAddressListEx hypercall do? Is there a doc update/clarification needed?

Regards,
Jork

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

RE: [PATCH 6/7] x86/hyper-v: use hypercall for remove TLB flush Jork Loeser <Jork.Loeser@microsoft.com> - 2017-04-10 19:40 +0200

csiph-web