Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1619817
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent latency multupliers |
| Date | 2017-04-10 13:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tuFmP-8iD-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tuvdL-1Fy-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tuvdL-1Fy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tuETM-7TH-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com> wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On Mon, Apr 10 2017 at 00:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> >> >> Make the schedutil governor compute the initial (default) value of >> the rate_limit_us sysfs attribute by multiplying the transition >> latency by a multiplier depending on the policy and set by the >> scaling driver (instead of using a constant for this purpose). >> >> That will allow scaling drivers to make schedutil use smaller default >> values of rate_limit_us and reduce the default average time interval >> between consecutive frequency changes. >> > > I've been thinking about this over the last couple of days, and I'm > thinking (in opposition to what I said at OSPM Pisa) that allowing > drivers to specify a _multiplier_ isn't ideal, since you lose > granularity when you want your rate limit to be close to your transition > latency (i.e. if your multiplier would be 2.5 or something). > > Can we instead just have an independent field > policy->default_rate_limit_us or similar? Yes, we can. Let me cut a v2 of this, shouldn't be too hard. :-) Thanks, Rafael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Updates related to the rate limit "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-04-10 02:20 +0200
[RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent latency multupliers "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-04-10 02:20 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent latency multupliers Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com> - 2017-04-10 12:40 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent latency multupliers "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-04-10 13:10 +0200
[RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-04-11 00:30 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-11 13:20 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-04-11 16:10 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-04-15 01:00 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-04-15 04:30 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays Brendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@arm.com> - 2017-04-18 11:50 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Use policy-dependent transition delays Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2017-04-17 07:50 +0200
[RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-04-10 02:20 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-04-10 08:40 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-04-10 23:00 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> - 2017-04-11 04:00 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-04-11 23:00 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-04-10 13:30 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-04-10 23:20 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-04-11 09:10 +0200
Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Utilization aggregation "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> - 2017-04-11 23:10 +0200
csiph-web