Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1619319
| From | Alfonso Lima <alfonsolimaastor@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be enclosed in parentheses |
| Date | 2017-04-08 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tu161-7uL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi,
In current linux-next, if you run the script on this piece of
code:
#define FOO(a) \
if (a) { \
something(); \
something_else(); \
}
You should get:
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#1: FILE: foo.c:1:
+#define FOO(a) \
+ if (a) { \
+ something(); \
+ something_else(); \
+ }
We could silence checkpatch.pl using "do {} while ()" around the
if statement. However, the "if () {}" statement should be
enough. If someone could confirm this, I'll go and fix it.
Thanks,
Alfonso
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be enclosed in parentheses Alfonso Lima <alfonsolimaastor@gmail.com> - 2017-04-08 18:10 +0200
Re: [bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be enclosed in parentheses Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-08 19:40 +0200
Re: [bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be enclosed in parentheses Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> - 2017-04-09 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Improve MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE test Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-09 19:50 +0200
[PATCH 1/2] checkpatch: Clarify the EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME message Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-09 19:50 +0200
csiph-web