Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1619319

[bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be enclosed in parentheses

From Alfonso Lima <alfonsolimaastor@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be enclosed in parentheses
Date 2017-04-08 18:10 +0200
Message-ID <tu161-7uL-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

In current linux-next, if you run the script on this piece of
code:

#define FOO(a)				\
	if (a) {			\
		something();		\
		something_else();	\
	}

You should get:

ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
#1: FILE: foo.c:1:
+#define FOO(a)				\
+	if (a) {			\
+		something();		\
+		something_else();	\
+	}

We could silence checkpatch.pl using "do {} while ()" around the
if statement. However, the "if () {}" statement should be
enough. If someone could confirm this, I'll go and fix it.

Thanks,
Alfonso

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be enclosed  in parentheses Alfonso Lima <alfonsolimaastor@gmail.com> - 2017-04-08 18:10 +0200
  Re: [bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be  enclosed in parentheses Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-08 19:40 +0200
    Re: [bug report] checkpatch: if statement does not need to be  enclosed in parentheses Andreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> - 2017-04-09 11:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 2/2] checkpatch: Improve  MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE test Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-09 19:50 +0200
      [PATCH 1/2] checkpatch: Clarify the EMBEDDED_FUNCTION_NAME message Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> - 2017-04-09 19:50 +0200

csiph-web