Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1617971

Re: [RFC net-next] bpf: taint loading !is_gpl programs

From Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC net-next] bpf: taint loading !is_gpl programs
Date 2017-04-06 14:50 +0200
Message-ID <ttf1o-8X-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <tsBx0-ao-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <tsE1Q-1QU-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tt5Y5-2W5-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:59:49PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> writes:
> 
> > On 04/04/2017 08:33 PM, Aaron Conole wrote:
> >> The eBPF framework is used for more than just socket level filtering.  It
> >> can also provide tracing, and even change the way packets coming into the
> >> system look.  Most of the eBPF callable symbols are available to non-gpl
> >> programs, and this includes helper functions which modify packets.  This
> >> allows proprietary eBPF code to link to the kernel and make decisions
> >> which can negatively impact network performance.
> >>
> >> Since the sources for these programs are only available under a proprietary
> >> license, it seems better to treat them the same as other proprietary
> >> modules: set the system taint flag.  An exemption is made for socket-level
> >> filters, since they do not really impact networking for the whole kernel.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@bytheb.org>
> >> ---
> >
> > Nacked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> 
> Thanks so much for looking at the patch!

Passive aggressive way of saying 'I want to waste your time'. Not cool.

> > This is proposal completely unreasonable; what the purpose of .gpl_only
> > flags is agreed upon since the beginning is that some of the helpers
> > are only available if the program is loaded as gpl, f.e. bpf_ktime_get_ns(),
> > bpf_probe_read(), bpf_probe_write_user(), bpf_trace_printk(),
> > bpf_skb_event_output(), etc.
> 
> This behavior isn't changing with this patch.

It's breaking userspace, hence obvious Nack.

> all of the networking functions, are gpl_only = false.  This means the
> community will have a difficult time supporting reports from this
> system.  After all, there's no way to know exactly how this eBPF program
> has changed packets in the network without a license to the code.

bpf is the user space program. Whatever you mean by 'community'
is obviously cannot 'support' all possible user space applications
written using given kernel abi.
The reason tracing progs are gpl because they look into gpl-ed kernel,
networking progs don't. They deal with bytes on the wire.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC net-next] bpf: taint loading !is_gpl programs Aaron Conole <aconole@bytheb.org> - 2017-04-04 20:40 +0200
  Re: [RFC net-next] bpf: taint loading !is_gpl programs Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-04-04 23:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC net-next] bpf: taint loading !is_gpl programs Aaron Conole <aconole@bytheb.org> - 2017-04-06 05:10 +0200
      Re: [RFC net-next] bpf: taint loading !is_gpl programs Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2017-04-06 14:50 +0200
        Re: [RFC net-next] bpf: taint loading !is_gpl programs Aaron Conole <aconole@bytheb.org> - 2017-04-07 19:50 +0200
          Re: [RFC net-next] bpf: taint loading !is_gpl programs Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> - 2017-04-09 01:20 +0200

csiph-web