Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1617772
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus |
| Date | 2017-04-06 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ttbTQ-6GC-39@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tsSHw-2II-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <tsV2F-4nq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tsWi5-54x-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tta1H-5sD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttabn-5wO-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:34:36AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 06-04-17 12:49:50, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Similar example that I gave in my reply to Mel. > > > > Lets consider 2 node, 24 core with 12 cores in each node. > > Cores 0-11 in Node 1 and cores 12-23 in the other node. > > Lets also disable smt/hyperthreading, enable isolcpus from core > > 6-11,12-17. Lets run 48 thread ebizzy workload and give it a cpu list > > of say 11,12-17 using taskset. > > > > Now all the 48 ebizzy threads will only run on core 11. It will never > > spread to other cores even in the same node(or in the same node/but > > isolated cpus) or to the different nodes. i.e even if numabalancing is > > running or not, even if my fix is around or not, all threads will be > > confined to core 11, even though the cpus_allowed is 11,12-17. Argh, why such a convoluted example :-( > Isn't that a bug in isolcpus implementation? It is certainly an > unexpected behavior I would say. Is this documented anywhere? Without engaging the brain too much to decipher the example; it does look right. isolcpus will have no balancing. > Isn't sched_setaffinity the only way how to actually make it possible to > run on isolcpus? Think so.. Personally I hate isolcpus and never use it. > I would really like to see it confirmed by the scheduler maintainers and > documented properly as well. What you are claiming here is rather > surprising to my understanding of what isolcpus acutally is. isolcpus gets you a set of fully partitioned CPUs. What's surprising about that?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-04 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> - 2017-04-04 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2017-04-04 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-05 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2017-04-05 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-05 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-05 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-05 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-04-06 09:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-06 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-06 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-06 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 12:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-06 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-06 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] sched: Fix numabalancing to work with isolated cpus Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-06 09:40 +0200
csiph-web