Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1619230
| From | Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT_FULL |
| Date | 2017-04-08 07:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ttR6G-150-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tnM01-11I-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tnM03-11I-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <ttOit-7Lu-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Fri, 2017-04-07 at 19:26 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > I would like to see more testing because... well... futexes. But, we don't have > a futex torture suite yet, but that is something I'm hoping to be looking into > in the near future. What testing we do have available has passed between my > futex selftests, the LTP suite, the pi_stress, and the RT runs by Sebastian. Ditto, tip-rt shows no signs of trouble.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT_FULL Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2017-04-08 04:30 +0200 Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT_FULL Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-04-08 07:30 +0200 Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT_FULL Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2017-04-10 10:50 +0200 Re: [PATCH -v6 13/13] futex: futex_lock_pi() vs PREEMPT_RT_FULL Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-04-10 11:10 +0200
csiph-web