Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1617482
| From | Eddie Kovsky <ewk@edkovsky.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH v5 2/2] extable: verify address is read-only |
| Date | 2017-04-06 05:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tt6r8-36F-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tt6r8-36F-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Provide a mechanism to check if the address of a variable is
const or ro_after_init. It mimics the existing functions that test if an
address is inside the kernel's text section.
The idea is to prevent structures that are not read-only from being
passed to functions. Other functions inside the kernel could then use
this capability to verify that their arguments are read-only.
This implements the first half of a suggestion made by Kees Cook for
the Kernel Self Protection Project:
- provide mechanism to check for ro_after_init memory areas, and
reject structures not marked ro_after_init in vmbus_register()
Suggested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@edkovsky.org>
---
Changes in v5:
- Replace __start_data_ro_after_init with __start_ro_after_init
- Replace __end_data_ro_after_init with __end_ro_after_init
Changes in v4:
- Rename function core_kernel_ro_data() to core_kernel_rodata().
Changes in v3:
- Fix missing declaration of is_module_rodata_address()
---
include/linux/kernel.h | 2 ++
kernel/extable.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/kernel.h b/include/linux/kernel.h
index 4c26dc3a8295..5748784ca209 100644
--- a/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ b/include/linux/kernel.h
@@ -444,6 +444,8 @@ extern int core_kernel_data(unsigned long addr);
extern int __kernel_text_address(unsigned long addr);
extern int kernel_text_address(unsigned long addr);
extern int func_ptr_is_kernel_text(void *ptr);
+extern int core_kernel_rodata(unsigned long addr);
+extern int kernel_ro_address(unsigned long addr);
unsigned long int_sqrt(unsigned long);
diff --git a/kernel/extable.c b/kernel/extable.c
index 2676d7f8baf6..18c5e4dbe0fc 100644
--- a/kernel/extable.c
+++ b/kernel/extable.c
@@ -154,3 +154,32 @@ int func_ptr_is_kernel_text(void *ptr)
return 1;
return is_module_text_address(addr);
}
+
+/**
+ * core_kernel_rodata - Verify address points to read-only section
+ * @addr: address to test
+ *
+ */
+int core_kernel_rodata(unsigned long addr)
+{
+ if (addr >= (unsigned long)__start_rodata &&
+ addr < (unsigned long)__end_rodata)
+ return 1;
+
+ if (addr >= (unsigned long)__start_ro_after_init &&
+ addr < (unsigned long)__end_ro_after_init)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Verify that address is const or ro_after_init. */
+int kernel_ro_address(unsigned long addr)
+{
+ if (core_kernel_rodata(addr))
+ return 1;
+ if (is_module_rodata_address(addr))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.12.2
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 0/2] provide check for ro_after_init memory sections Eddie Kovsky <ewk@edkovsky.org> - 2017-04-06 05:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 1/2] module: verify address is read-only Eddie Kovsky <ewk@edkovsky.org> - 2017-04-06 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] module: verify address is read-only Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com> - 2017-04-07 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] module: verify address is read-only Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-07 22:50 +0200
[PATCH v5 2/2] extable: verify address is read-only Eddie Kovsky <ewk@edkovsky.org> - 2017-04-06 05:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] extable: verify address is read-only kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2017-04-06 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] extable: verify address is read-only Eddie Kovsky <ewk@edkovsky.org> - 2017-04-07 21:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] extable: verify address is read-only Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-07 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] provide check for ro_after_init memory sections Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-08 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] provide check for ro_after_init memory sections Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-04-08 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] provide check for ro_after_init memory sections Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-08 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] provide check for ro_after_init memory sections Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-04-08 00:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] provide check for ro_after_init memory sections Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-08 00:50 +0200
csiph-web