Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1615241
| From | Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users |
| Date | 2017-04-03 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tsb9w-80W-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ts9ho-6Oe-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Andy,
thank you for the patch.
On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 15:26 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> There is Device Tree oriented check for optional resource. Of course
> it will fail on non-DT platforms.
>
> Remove this check to make things optional for all users.
>
> Fixes: bb475230b8e5 ("reset: make optional functions really optional")
> Cc: Ramiro Oliveira <Ramiro.Oliveira@synopsys.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> The reset framework is too Device Tree oriented, and who knows what
> the logic was behind the commit which introduced devm_reset_*()
> functions without thinking out of the DT box.
At the time, there was nothing outside of the box to describe reset
lines, and as far as I am aware there still isn't, so the devm_reset_*
should behave as if the reset line is not specified in the non-DT case.
Returning -EINVAL was reasonable in that case, before the API was
changed to describe unavailable, optional reset controls as rstc = NULL.
> This commit fixes almost all Intel newest boards that have no legacy
> UART since UART driver started using this DT-centric framework.
Is this is about 8250_dw.c? Unfortunately it sometimes takes a little
while for me to get updated on the big picture, as I only get the actual
reset driver and framework patches in my inbox. Usually I only see the
reset consumer changes when I actively look for them.
But the fault in this case was is with me not considering all possible
code paths influenced by commit bb475230b8e5, in the configurations that
I can't test myself.
> drivers/reset/core.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/reset/core.c b/drivers/reset/core.c
> index f1e5e65388bb..62314e663f29 100644
> --- a/drivers/reset/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/reset/core.c
> @@ -331,9 +331,6 @@ struct reset_control *__of_reset_control_get(struct device_node *node,
Ideally, __of_reset_control_get would not be called at all in the non-DT
case. I'll change that in the next round, but for now I'd prefer a small
fix in place.
> int rstc_id;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!node)
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> -
This should be
if (!node)
return optional ? NULL : ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
instead. Can you confirm this works for Intel boards with DW UART? I can
fix it up when applying if you agree.
> if (id) {
> index = of_property_match_string(node,
> "reset-names", id);
regards
Philipp
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-04-03 14:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2017-04-03 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com> - 2017-04-03 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2017-04-03 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-04-03 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> - 2017-04-03 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> - 2017-04-03 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v1] reset: Make optional stuff optional for all users Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2017-04-03 16:40 +0200
csiph-web