Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1616991
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] arm64/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state |
| Date | 2017-04-05 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tsU6B-3Kb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tsAKB-81K-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tsAKB-81K-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 10:47:27AM -0700, Thomas Garnier wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > index 43512d4d7df2..6d598e7051c3 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S > @@ -744,6 +744,10 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_switch_to) > ret_fast_syscall: > disable_irq // disable interrupts > str x0, [sp, #S_X0] // returned x0 > + ldr x2, [tsk, #TSK_TI_ADDR_LIMIT] // check addr limit change > + mov x1, #TASK_SIZE_64 > + cmp x2, x1 > + b.ne addr_limit_fail KERNEL_DS is set to the maximum address (-1UL), so it would be easier to check against this here and avoid a "mov". Even simpler if you'd check against bit 63 of the address for KERNEL_DS: ldr x1, [tsk, TSK_TI_ADDR_LIMIT] // check addr limit change tbnz x1, #63, addr_limit_fail // KERNEL_DS is -1UL > ldr x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] // re-check for syscall tracing > and x2, x1, #_TIF_SYSCALL_WORK > cbnz x2, ret_fast_syscall_trace > @@ -771,6 +775,11 @@ work_pending: > */ > ret_to_user: > disable_irq // disable interrupts > + ldr x2, [tsk, #TSK_TI_ADDR_LIMIT] // check addr limit change > + mov x1, #TASK_SIZE_64 > + cmp x2, x1 > + b.ne addr_limit_fail Same here. > + > ldr x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS] > and x2, x1, #_TIF_WORK_MASK > cbnz x2, work_pending > @@ -779,6 +788,12 @@ finish_ret_to_user: > kernel_exit 0 > ENDPROC(ret_to_user) > > +addr_limit_fail: > + stp x0, lr, [sp,#-16]! > + bl asm_verify_pre_usermode_state > + ldp x0, lr, [sp],#16 > + ret lr Where is this supposed to return? What is the value of lr when branching to addr_limit_fail? -- Catalin
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 4/4] arm64/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2017-04-04 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] arm64/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-04-05 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] arm64/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2017-04-05 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] arm64/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-04-05 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] arm64/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com> - 2017-04-05 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 4/4] arm64/syscalls: Specific usage of verify_pre_usermode_state Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2017-04-07 18:20 +0200
csiph-web