Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*()

From	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*()
Date	2017-04-05 13:40 +0200
Message-ID	<tsRs5-22m-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tsNRv-89c-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tsNRw-89c-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <tsRs5-22m-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Michal,

Am 05.04.2017 um 13:31 schrieb Michal Hocko:
> On Wed 05-04-17 09:47:00, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Nandsim has own functions set_memalloc() and clear_memalloc() for robust
>> setting and clearing of PF_MEMALLOC. Replace them by the new generic helpers.
>> No functional change.
> 
> This one smells like an abuser. Why the hell should read/write path
> touch memory reserves at all!

Could be. Let's ask Adrian, AFAIK he wrote that code.
Adrian, can you please clarify why nandsim needs to play with PF_MEMALLOC?

Thanks,
//richard

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 0/4] more robust PF_MEMALLOC handling Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-04-05 09:50 +0200
  [PATCH 3/4] treewide: convert PF_MEMALLOC manipulations to new helpers Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-04-05 09:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 3/4] treewide: convert PF_MEMALLOC manipulations to new  helpers Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-05 13:40 +0200
      Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 3/4] treewide: convert PF_MEMALLOC manipulations to  new helpers Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be> - 2017-04-06 09:00 +0200
        Re: [Nbd] [PATCH 3/4] treewide: convert PF_MEMALLOC manipulations to  new helpers Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> - 2017-04-06 13:30 +0200
  [PATCH 1/4] mm: prevent potential recursive reclaim due to clearing PF_MEMALLOC Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-04-05 09:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: prevent potential recursive reclaim due to  clearing PF_MEMALLOC Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-05 13:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: prevent potential recursive reclaim due to clearing PF_MEMALLOC "Hillf Danton" <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com> - 2017-04-07 09:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm: prevent potential recursive reclaim due to  clearing PF_MEMALLOC Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-04-07 11:30 +0200
  [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*() Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-04-05 09:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*() Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-04-05 13:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-05 14:20 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*() Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2017-04-06 08:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-06 09:30 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*() Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-04-05 13:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: nandsim: convert to memalloc_noreclaim_*() Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2017-04-05 13:40 +0200

csiph-web