Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1614277
| From | Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] Allow user probes on versioned symbols |
| Date | 2017-03-31 21:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <trayR-r5-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tr7hE-6Q2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <tr8GJ-7Fk-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 03/31/2017 12:31 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 11:06:16AM -0500, Paul Clarke escreveu: >> Symbol versioning, as in glibc, results in symbols being defined as: >> <real symbol>@[@]<version> >> (Note that "@@" identifies a default symbol, if the symbol name >> is repeated.) >> >> perf is currently unable to deal with this, and is unable to create >> user probes at such symbols: > > On top of what tree/branch should I try to apply this? I worked from torvalds/linux. > Trying on acme/perf/core: Pardon my ignorance, but where can I find that tree? > [acme@jouet linux]$ patch -p1 < /wb/1.patch > patching file tools/perf/util/auxtrace.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 1875. [...] > Apart from that, you are not checking the return of strndup, that > however unlikely, can fail, so must be checked. It's in the middle of strcmp-type function, so all return values are valid. Shall I emit a message and call exit()? > On the style front you sometimes add a space after commas, sometimes > not, please make sure you add one. Ack. > But apart from those problems, I think that one should be able to ask > for a versioned symbol, to probe just apps using that specific version, I agree, but wasn't trying to tackle that at the moment. I can look into it, though. > for instance, we should consider the whole name as two functions, which > in fact, they are, no? I'm not sure I understand what you mean here. Do you mean we should set a probe at every version of a given symbol name? For example, if there are symbols: a@@V2 a@V1.1 a@V1 ...for a request to set a probe at "a", we'd actually set a probe at all 3? > Additionaly, I can't reproduce your problem here, on x86_64: I just cloned from acme/linux, and will rebase to there, if that's the best tree. PC
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3] Allow user probes on versioned symbols Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> - 2017-03-31 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] Allow user probes on versioned symbols Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-03-31 19:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] Allow user probes on versioned symbols Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> - 2017-03-31 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] Allow user probes on versioned symbols Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-04-03 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] Allow user probes on versioned symbols Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> - 2017-04-04 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] Allow user probes on versioned symbols Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-04-04 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] Allow user probes on versioned symbols Paul Clarke <pc@us.ibm.com> - 2017-04-06 05:50 +0200
csiph-web