Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1614838
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] signal: Don't allow accessing signal_struct by old threads after exec |
| Date | Mon, 03 Apr 2017 01:10:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <trWNb-78a-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tapDY-4My-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <teqL8-2Ds-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgK2Z-26x-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <tgZlo-4ue-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <th13Q-5HD-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <th1Qe-6jM-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <th1Qe-6jM-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <th1Qe-6jM-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <thllT-3Un-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tqDtg-3qZ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <trjC9-6Er-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <trWDv-6PH-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| X-Xm-Spf | eid=1cuoWS-0002Ov-6w;;;mid=<87zify76z9.fsf_-_@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.234.240;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral |
| X-Xm-Aid | U2FsdGVkX19w2DC6HQ6C+icl9fuBkdy5AmJiu74dvDw= |
| X-Sa-Exim-Connect-IP | 67.3.234.240 |
| X-Sa-Exim-Mail-From | ebiederm@xmission.com |
| X-Spam-Report | * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 1.5 TR_Symld_Words too many words that have symbols inside * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject * 1.0 XMSubMetaSx_00 1+ Sexy Words * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject |
| X-Spam-Dcc | XMission; sa06 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 |
| X-Spam-Combo | ***;Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> |
| X-Spam-Timing | total 5546 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.08 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.4 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.3 (0.0%), parse: 1.37 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (0.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.95 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 6 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.23 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 1.04 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 29 (0.5%), check_bayes: 28 (0.5%), b_tokenize: 12 (0.2%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 2.3 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.4 (0.1%), b_finish: 0.64 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 226 (4.1%), check_dkim_signature: 0.62 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 3.2 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 5263 (94.9%), poll_dns_idle: 5253 (94.7%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) |
| X-Spam-Flag | No |
| X-Sa-Exim-Version | 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) |
| X-Sa-Exim-Scanned | Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 97 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Aleksa Sarai <asarai@suse.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Attila Fazekas <afazekas@redhat.com>, Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org |
| X-Original-Date | Sun, 02 Apr 2017 17:57:46 -0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <87zify76z9.fsf_-_@xmission.com> |
| X-Original-References | <20170213141452.GA30203@redhat.com> <20170224160354.GA845@redhat.com> <87shmv6ufl.fsf@xmission.com> <20170303173326.GA17899@redhat.com> <87tw7axlr0.fsf@xmission.com> <87d1dyw5iw.fsf@xmission.com> <87tw7aunuh.fsf@xmission.com> <87lgsmunmj.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <20170304170312.GB13131@redhat.com> <8760ir192p.fsf@xmission.com> <878tnkpv8h.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <874ly6a0h1.fsf_-_@xmission.com> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1614838 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Add exec_id to signal_struct and compare it at a few choice moments.
I believe this closes the security holes that letting the zombie
threads linger after exec opens up.
The problem is that old threads may have different creds after a setuid
exec, and then formerly shared resources may change. So signal sending
and accesses by proc need to be blocked.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 1 +
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 1 +
kernel/fork.c | 1 +
kernel/ptrace.c | 4 ++++
kernel/signal.c | 7 ++++++-
5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 303a114b00ce..730dee8bb2f8 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1323,6 +1323,7 @@ void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
/* An exec changes our domain. We are no longer part of the thread
group */
current->self_exec_id++;
+ current->signal->exec_id = current->self_exec_id;
flush_signal_handlers(current, 0);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(setup_new_exec);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
index 2cf446704cd4..63ae951ee330 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ struct signal_struct {
atomic_t live;
int nr_threads;
struct list_head thread_head;
+ u32 exec_id;
wait_queue_head_t wait_chldexit; /* for wait4() */
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 0632ac1180be..a442fa099842 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1387,6 +1387,7 @@ static int copy_signal(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *tsk)
sig->oom_score_adj = current->signal->oom_score_adj;
sig->oom_score_adj_min = current->signal->oom_score_adj_min;
+ sig->exec_id = current->self_exec_id;
mutex_init(&sig->cred_guard_mutex);
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index 0af928712174..cc6b10b1ffbe 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -277,6 +277,10 @@ static int __ptrace_may_access(struct task_struct *task, unsigned int mode)
* or halting the specified task is impossible.
*/
+ /* Don't allow inspecting a thread after exec */
+ if (task->self_exec_id != task->signal->exec_id)
+ return 1;
+
/* Don't let security modules deny introspection */
if (same_thread_group(task, current))
return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index fd75ba33ee3d..fe8dcdb622f5 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -995,6 +995,10 @@ static int __send_signal(int sig, struct siginfo *info, struct task_struct *t,
from_ancestor_ns || (info == SEND_SIG_FORCED)))
goto ret;
+ /* Don't allow thread group signals after exec */
+ if (group && (t->signal->exec_id != t->self_exec_id))
+ goto ret;
+
pending = group ? &t->signal->shared_pending : &t->pending;
/*
* Short-circuit ignored signals and support queuing
@@ -1247,7 +1251,8 @@ struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
* must see ->sighand == NULL.
*/
spin_lock(&sighand->siglock);
- if (likely(sighand == tsk->sighand)) {
+ if (likely((sighand == tsk->sighand) &&
+ (tsk->self_exec_id == tsk->signal->exec_id))) {
rcu_read_unlock();
break;
}
--
2.10.1
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC][PATCH] exec: Don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped. ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-03-30 10:20 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 0/2] exec: Fixing ptrace'd mulit-threaded hang ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-01 07:20 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 1/2] sighand: Count each thread group once in sighand_struct ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-01 07:20 +0200
[RFC][PATCH 2/2] exec: If possible don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-01 07:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] exec: If possible don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-02 17:40 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] exec: If possible don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-02 21:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] exec: If possible don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-03 20:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] exec: If possible don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-03 23:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] exec: If possible don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-05 18:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] exec: Fixing ptrace'd mulit-threaded hang Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-02 17:40 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 4/5] exec: If possible don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 4/5] exec: If possible don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-05 18:20 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 1/5] ptrace: Don't wait in PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT for exec or coredump ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 1/5] ptrace: Don't wait in PTRACE_O_TRACEEXIT for exec or coredump Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-05 18:30 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 0/5] exec: Fixing ptrace'd mulit-threaded hang ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 3/5] clone: Disallown CLONE_THREAD with a shared sighand_struct ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 3/5] clone: Disallown CLONE_THREAD with a shared sighand_struct Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-05 18:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 3/5] clone: Disallown CLONE_THREAD with a shared sighand_struct ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-05 19:50 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 3/5] clone: Disallown CLONE_THREAD with a shared sighand_struct Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-05 20:20 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 2/5] sighand: Count each thread group once in sighand_struct ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-03 01:00 +0200
[RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] signal: Don't allow accessing signal_struct by old threads after exec ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-03 01:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] signal: Don't allow accessing signal_struct by old threads after exec Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-05 18:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] signal: Don't allow accessing signal_struct by old threads after exec ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-05 20:30 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 5/5] signal: Don't allow accessing signal_struct by old threads after exec Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-06 18:00 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] exec: Don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped. Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-02 18:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] exec: Don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped. ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-02 23:20 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] exec: Don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped. Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-03 20:40 +0200
scope of cred_guard_mutex. ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-04 01:00 +0200
Re: scope of cred_guard_mutex. Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-05 18:10 +0200
Re: scope of cred_guard_mutex. Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-05 18:20 +0200
Re: scope of cred_guard_mutex. ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-05 20:10 +0200
Re: scope of cred_guard_mutex. Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-05 20:20 +0200
Re: scope of cred_guard_mutex. Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2017-04-06 18:00 +0200
Re: scope of cred_guard_mutex. Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-04-08 00:10 +0200
Re: [RFC][PATCH] exec: Don't wait for ptraced threads to be reaped. ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) - 2017-04-04 01:00 +0200
csiph-web