Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1614058
| From | Andrea Reale <ar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] Memory hotplug support for arm64 platform |
| Date | 2017-03-31 16:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tr5zc-5Hc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <sQy77-1ef-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <sQLH3-1Fi-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sR0mK-2AR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <t7PuV-4fh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <tqwrL-6Aq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Florian, thanks for your message. Please, find the replies in-line. On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 05:40:02PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > While the "hack" that sets/clears NOMAP in order for pfn_valid() to > return false/true when appropriate during __add_pages() definitively > does seem to work to probe the memory section, don't you also hit the > same warning when you try to online that memory section in > pages_correctly_reserved() once you have cleared the NOMAP flag? Before arch_add_memory returns, we clear the nomap flag on the blocks, so that pfn_valid will return true when executing on the corresponding pages. This means that the condition in pages_correctly_reserved in drivers/base/memory.c: if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pfn_valid(pfn))) will evaluate to false, so no warning should be issued, and the function should continue to execute as expected. Is it that you were referring to or did I miss the point? > I will definitively give this a try on ARM64 since I need to get it > working there. Thanks a lot, any help in testing is really appreciated. > Do you mind posting a non-RFC patch? We should release the hot-remove code that myself and Maciej have been working on very soon (say, around one week); the plan is to rebase everything and release hot-add and hot-remove as a single patch series (including Scott's original patches and our hot-add patches). If you can wait until then, we will probably minimize entropy; otherwise we can also re-post the hot-add patches earlier and separately. Thanks and regards, Andrea
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH] Memory hotplug support for arm64 platform Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> - 2017-03-30 02:50 +0200 Re: [RFC PATCH] Memory hotplug support for arm64 platform Andrea Reale <ar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-03-31 16:20 +0200
csiph-web