Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1612428
| From | hpa@zytor.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache |
| Date | 2017-03-30 00:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tquzD-5dc-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tqt0S-4cP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <tqtaz-4hp-39@gated-at.bofh.it> <tqttU-4o9-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <tqttV-4o9-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <tqtDA-4sl-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On March 29, 2017 2:41:00 PM PDT, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> >wrote: >> >> Randomization also needs to leave thread_info at the beginning. Can >it do that? > >Good point, and good question. No idea if the gcc extension can do, >but yes, it clearly needs a "you can't move this entry". > >I assume it has some such capability already, because it's fairly >common to have that kind of "beginning of structure if fixed" due to >unions of structures anyway. > > Linus An alternative is to wrap the randomized structure inside a nonrandomized wrapper structure. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-03-29 22:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> - 2017-03-29 23:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-03-29 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-29 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-29 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2017-03-29 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-29 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache hpa@zytor.com - 2017-03-30 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-30 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-03-30 04:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] x86/fpu: move FPU state into separate cache Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-03-29 23:40 +0200
csiph-web