Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1612218
| From | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: Impact of CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y / mmap benchmark |
| Date | 2017-03-29 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tqqcG-2eW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tq36p-2vD-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <tqoaS-AU-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote: > On 03/28/17 10:17, Radu Rendec wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to assess the performance impact of enabling PARAVIRT (and > > XEN) in a custom kernel configuration. I came across a very old thread > > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/13/449) on this topic and the conclusion > > back then was that the performance impact was (arguably) around 1%. > > > > Does anyone still have a copy of Ingo Molnar's mmap-perf.c program (the > > old link is broken)? Would it still be relevant to use it for measuring > > performance in case of PARAVIRT? > > > > Last but not least, has anyone looked into PARAVIRT performance more > > recently? > > > > Thank you! > > > > Best regards, > > Radu Rendec > > I have mmap-perf.c that says: > /* Copyright Ingo Molnar (c) 2006 */ > > and no license info... > Ingo? It's GPL v2, like the kernel. Thanks, Ingo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Impact of CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y / mmap benchmark Radu Rendec <rrendec@arista.com> - 2017-03-28 19:30 +0200
Re: Impact of CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y / mmap benchmark Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> - 2017-03-29 18:00 +0200
Re: Impact of CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y / mmap benchmark Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2017-03-29 20:10 +0200
Re: Impact of CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y / mmap benchmark Radu Rendec <rrendec@arista.com> - 2017-03-31 12:10 +0200
Re: Impact of CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y / mmap benchmark Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> - 2017-03-31 19:10 +0200
csiph-web