Re: [PATCH v1] perf report: Drop cycles 0 for LBR print

From	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v1] perf report: Drop cycles 0 for LBR print
Date	2017-03-28 21:40 +0200
Message-ID	<tq58f-3Wt-59@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<tj1j4-2og-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <tq1nY-1do-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <tq2N5-2mE-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

Em Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:05:44AM -0700, Andi Kleen escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:34:52PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 04:06:26PM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
> > > For some platforms, for example Broadwell, it doesn't support cycles
> > > for LBR. But the perf always prints cycles:0, it's not necessary.
> > > 
> > > The patch refactors the LBR info print code and drops the cycles:0.
> > > 
> > > For example: perf report --branch-history --no-children --stdio
> > 
> > Can I get some reviewed-by or acked-by for this patch? Andi? Kan?
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v1] perf report: Drop cycles 0 for LBR print Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-03-28 17:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v1] perf report: Drop cycles 0 for LBR print Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> - 2017-03-28 19:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v1] perf report: Drop cycles 0 for LBR print Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2017-03-28 21:40 +0200

csiph-web